On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:47:43PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Richard Purdie
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 21:14 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:

quoted

Op 21 mrt. 2012, om 20:42 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:

quoted

On 03/21/2012 07:25 AM, Samuel Stirtzel wrote:

quoted

* This move will allow the testing of meta-kde for users without meta-openembedded.

So what other layers are using giflib?

Your suggesting that we need to have it in oe-core so people don't need to add the meta-openembedded layer when using meta-kde?

I am just trying to get more data before making a decision.

Let's put everything in oe-core!

And then again and again!

quoted

Let's try and be constructive ;-).

I think to make a good decision about this we need to understand which
layers use giflib.

Is this really the only component from meta-oe that meta-kde needs? If
it is, I think the request is certainly worth thinking about as we do
want to try and minimise and untangle the dependency spider web if we
can.

I think this library could belong to OE-Core since its a library for GIF images
its currently used by EFL libs. Putting it in OE-Core would be a better thing
IMO since it seems common library

FWIW: meta-efl depends on more stuff from meta-oe so moving giflib won't
remove meta-oe dependency from meta-efl.

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com