Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] zypper: support signed repositories
From: Saul Wold <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-30 22:20:56
On 01/30/2012 01:50 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 01/30/2012 01:12 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote:quoted
The current zypper implementation does not work with signed repositories. This patch series adds recipes for the required packages as well as the necessary runtime dependencies to zypper. Tested on Gumstix Overo (OMAP3) with meta-openembedded layer enabled and a systemd based console image. Version 4 incorporates feedback from Koen Kooi, Saul Wold, Khem Raj, and Anders Darander - adds runtime dependencies to existing RDEPENDS_${PN} of zypper - removes duplicate recipe for libassuan - moves recipes for gnupg and libksba to recipes-support - adds dependency on libgpg-error for libksba - cleans up LICENSE field Steve Sakoman (3): libksba: add recipe for 1.2.0 gnupg: add recipe for 2.0.18Steve, I am still reviewing this, and I need to to a build with non-GPLv3, since you might have added a dependency with zypper on a GPLv3 item, this will take me some checking.
As I suspected, if we set INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE = "GPLv3" and try a build, I get the following error: NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'gnupg' (but /intel/poky/distro/meta/recipes-extended/zypper/zypper_git.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it) ERROR: gnupg was skipped: incompatible with license GPLv3 & LGPLv3 NOTE: Runtime target 'gnupg' is unbuildable, removing... Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['gnupg'] NOTE: Runtime target 'zypper' is unbuildable, removing... Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['zypper', 'gnupg'] NOTE: Runtime target 'task-core-basic' is unbuildable, removing... Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['task-core-basic', 'zypper', 'gnupg'] ERROR: Required build target 'core-image-basic' has no buildable providers. Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['core-image-basic', 'task-core-basic', 'zypper', 'gnupg'] This would imply that we need to have a GPLv2 Version of the gnupg recipe also, Steve if you had to look at or handle the newer GPLv3 gnupg code itself, you may not be able to write the GPLv2 recipe or create patches for it, can you arrange for someone to create that patch? Thanks Sau!
You might want to prepare a patch and test with a GPLv2 version of gnupg as well. This will not hold up this patch if we know the GPLv2 version is forth coming. Thanks Sau!quoted
zypper: add missing runtime dependences on gzip and gnupg meta/recipes-extended/zypper/zypper_git.bb | 4 ++-- meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_2.0.18.bb | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ meta/recipes-support/libksba/libksba_1.2.0.bb | 12 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/gnupg/gnupg_2.0.18.bb create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libksba/libksba_1.2.0.bb _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core