Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] gpu: nova-core: add NVKV decoder
From: Eliot Courtney <hidden>
Date: 2026-09-14 05:46:10
Also in:
dri-devel, lkml, rust-for-linux
On Thu Sep 10, 2026 at 4:47 PM JST, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Thu Aug 27, 2026 at 11:12 PM JST, Eliot Courtney wrote: <...>quoted
+ /// Decodes every pair into `schema` and returns the result of [`Schema::finish`]. + pub(crate) fn decode<'s, S: Schema>( + &self, + schema: &'s mut S, + ) -> Result<impl Init<S::Target, Error> + 's> { + let mut cursor = Cursor::new(self.data); + while !cursor.is_empty() { + let op: Op = cursor.take_u64()?.into(); + + let key = op.key().into(); + let index = op.index(); + let op_value: u32 = op.value().into(); + match op.opcode()? { + Opcode::Imm32 => { + self.visit(schema, key, index, DecoderValue::Scalar32(op_value))?; + } + Opcode::Seq32 => { + let values = cursor.take_u32s(num::u32_as_usize(op_value))?; + for (i, &value) in values.iter().enumerate() { + let key = Self::seq_key(key, i)?; + self.visit(schema, key, index, DecoderValue::Scalar32(value))?; + } + } + Opcode::Seq64 => { + let values = cursor.take_u64s(num::u32_as_usize(op_value))?; + for (i, &value) in values.iter().enumerate() { + let key = Self::seq_key(key, i)?; + self.visit(schema, key, index, DecoderValue::Scalar64(value))?; + } + }Another thing that could be worth clarifying: are `Seq32`/`Seq64` with a count of `0` valid? Right now they won't trigger a visit or an error, i.e. they will be silently ignored. Whereas arrays of size 0 do trigger a visit (which sounds logical). I'm not saying this is a problem, just wondering if the behavior is consistent with what NVKV specifies in such cases.
Yes, it's valid to have a sequence of length zero according to the C implementation [1]. The semantics are that a sequence of length 0 is equivalent to nothing sent. [1]: https://github.com/NVIDIA/open-gpu-kernel-modules/blob/615.71.09/src/nvidia/src/libraries/nvkv/nvkv.c#L62-L119