Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 1d ago

[PATCH net] netfilter: xt_recent: do not call remove_proc_entry() under recent_lock

flat view
WARM1d

From: Cen Zhang (Microsoft) <hidden>
Date: 2026-10-28 21:45:01
Also in: lkml, netfilter-devel, stable
Subsystem: netfilter, networking [general], the rest · Maintainers: Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

recent_proc_net_exit() removes the /proc/net/xt_recent/<name> entries of
a dying network namespace while holding spin_lock_bh(&recent_lock).
remove_proc_entry() may sleep: proc_entry_rundown() waits until every
task that is still inside the entry's file operations has left. A reader
of such an entry is counted in by proc_reg_read() before
recent_seq_start() takes recent_lock. So if a read is in flight when the
namespace is torn down, cleanup_net() sleeps in atomic context holding
the spinlock that the reader is spinning on, and neither side can ever
make progress.

An unprivileged user can trigger this from a user namespace by adding a
rule with the "recent" match and reading its proc file while the
namespace is being destroyed. As recent_lock is global, every later
attempt to take it spins forever too: the spinning can spread to all
CPUs, and network namespace teardown stops system-wide.

  BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
    kernel/sched/completion.c:116
   #3: (recent_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: recent_net_exit+0x2b/0x140
  Workqueue: netns cleanup_net
  Call Trace:
   proc_entry_rundown+0x185/0x1b0
   remove_proc_entry+0x21a/0x520
   recent_net_exit+0x7f/0x140
   cleanup_net+0x414/0x8f0
  ...
  rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
  Call Trace:
   queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x313/0xc20
   recent_seq_start+0x87/0x1b0
   seq_read_iter+0x265/0x11e0
   proc_reg_read+0x1ab/0x270

Fix by taking recent_mutex instead of recent_lock. According to
commit a0e889bb1bdc ("[NETFILTER]: recent match: fix "sleeping function
called from invalid context""), recent_mutex is the lock to use here: it
protects recent_net->tables and was introduced so that proc entries are
created and removed without recent_lock held, because those calls may
sleep. hashlimit_proc_net_exit() does the same for xt_hashlimit.

Fixes: 665e205c16c1 ("netfilter: xt_recent: fix namespace destroy path")
Cc: <redacted>
Cc: <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang (Microsoft) <redacted>
---
 net/netfilter/xt_recent.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c b/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c
index 55f1f2d89952..00cccf003cff 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c
@@ -650,14 +650,15 @@ static void __net_exit recent_proc_net_exit(struct net *net)
 
 	/* recent_net_exit() is called before recent_mt_destroy(). Make sure
 	 * that the parent xt_recent proc entry is empty before trying to
-	 * remove it.
+	 * remove it. Use recent_mutex instead of recent_lock since
+	 * remove_proc_entry() may sleep.
 	 */
-	spin_lock_bh(&recent_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&recent_mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry(t, &recent_net->tables, list)
 	        remove_proc_entry(t->name, recent_net->xt_recent);
 
 	recent_net->xt_recent = NULL;
-	spin_unlock_bh(&recent_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&recent_mutex);
 
 	remove_proc_entry("xt_recent", net->proc_net);
 }
-- 
2.55.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help