Re: [PATCH net-next 0/11] pull-request: can-next 2026-10-21

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-10-21 20:56:32
Also in: linux-can
Reply to: Oliver Hartkopp, 2026-10-21

On Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:33:38 +0200 Oliver Hartkopp wrote:

the original PR is pull-request: can-next 2026-10-18

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20261018164417.1540449-1-mkl@pengutronix.de/ (local)

and I had to fix some sashiko-bots reports that didn't show up in 
previous postings on the CAN mailing list and its LMM.

So its really just a fixes version of can-next 2026-10-18.

Right, looks like fixes mostly. Could you please quickly look over 
the feedback on patch 11?

Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
[PATCH net-next 02/11] can: skb: make echo skb freeing safe in any IRQ context · Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
Re: [PATCH net-next 02/11] can: skb: make echo skb freeing safe in any IRQ context · netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org · 2026-10-22
[PATCH net-next 04/11] can: skb: make CAN skb allocation failure paths IRQ-safe · Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
[PATCH net-next 01/11] can: dev: can_dropped_invalid_skb: drop CAN XL frames on non-CAN XL devices · Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
Re: [PATCH net-next 01/11] can: dev: can_dropped_invalid_skb: drop CAN XL frames on non-CAN XL devices · netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org · 2026-10-21
[PATCH net-next 03/11] can: raw: remove redundant NULL check before netdev_hold() · Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
[PATCH net-next 06/11] can: proc: reset pkg_stats atomics individually · Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
[PATCH net-next 09/11] can: replace ARPHRD_CAN type checks with can_get_ml_priv() · Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
[PATCH net-next 07/11] can: proc: skip stats calculation after reset in can_stat_update() · Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
[PATCH net-next 08/11] can: proc: remove pointers from CAN specific proc output · Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
[PATCH net-next 10/11] can: dev: can_put_echo_skb(): free skb on invalid echo index · Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
[PATCH net-next 05/11] can: isotp: check the frame type, not just the length · Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
[PATCH net-next 11/11] can: protect the receive lists with a per-device lock · Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
Re: [PATCH net-next 11/11] can: protect the receive lists with a per-device lock · Jakub Kicinski · 2026-10-21
Re: [PATCH net-next 11/11] can: protect the receive lists with a per-device lock · Oliver Hartkopp · 2026-10-21
Re: [PATCH net-next 11/11] can: protect the receive lists with a per-device lock · Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
Re: [PATCH net-next 11/11] can: protect the receive lists with a per-device lock · Oliver Hartkopp · 2026-10-21
Re: [PATCH net-next 11/11] can: protect the receive lists with a per-device lock · Marc Kleine-Budde · 2026-10-21
Re: [PATCH net-next 11/11] can: protect the receive lists with a per-device lock · netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org · 2026-10-22
Paolo Abeni · 2026-10-21
Oliver Hartkopp · 2026-10-21
Jakub Kicinski · 2026-10-21
Oliver Hartkopp · 2026-10-21
View all 24 messages

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread / next series-diff position
`k`	previous message in thread / previous series-diff position
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help