[PATCH bpf-next v2 02/43] bpf: forbid sleeping in hash map for_each callbacks
flat view
WARM1d
IN BPF-NEXT
From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2026-10-17 16:38:02
Also in:
bpf
Subsystem:
bpf [core], bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), the rest · Maintainers:
Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Linus Torvalds
Revision v2 of 2 in this series; queued in bpf-next as 9bdd5e7f5d83 on 2026-10-17.
Revisions (2)
- v1 [diff vs current]
- v2 current
From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
A sleepable program (e.g. SEC("syscall"), lsm.s, fentry.s) can pass a
callback to bpf_for_each_map_elem() on a hash map and call a sleepable
helper or kfunc such as bpf_copy_from_user() from it. The verifier
accepts this, but at run time the callback is invoked from inside an RCU
read-side critical section:
bpf_for_each_hash_elem()
rcu_read_lock();
callback_fn(map, key, val, ctx, 0);
bpf_copy_from_user() <- may fault and sleep
rcu_read_unlock();
bpf_each_rhash_elem() does the same for BPF_MAP_TYPE_RHASH. Sleeping
there triggers the "Voluntary context switch within RCU read-side
critical section!" warning, delays grace periods, and with
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=n silently ends the read-side critical section that
the bucket walk relies on.
Synchronous callbacks are verified with the caller's state, so
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:in_sleepable_context() only looks at the program's
sleepability and the locks the program took itself, and does not know
that the helper holds rcu_read_lock() around the callback.
With a SEC("syscall") program whose callback reads a page that has to be
read from disk first:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/uaccess.h:169
RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 0
__might_fault+0x29/0x80
_copy_from_user+0x26/0x90
bpf_copy_from_user+0x23/0x60
bpf_prog_17d44fa39eebd6cc_cb+0x35/0x46
bpf_for_each_hash_elem+0xdb/0x280
Fix by marking the callback frame of hash map iteration as running under
RCU and making in_sleepable_context() false while such a frame is on the
call stack, so sleepable helpers, kfuncs and global functions are
rejected there as inside bpf_rcu_read_lock(). The rules for trusting RCU
protected pointers are left alone, which is conservative and keeps
callbacks that verify today and do not sleep working. The flag is
compared in func_states_equal() so that pruning never mixes the two
contexts. Array map callbacks run without any lock and keep the caller's
context.
Fixes: 314ee05e2fc6 ("bpf: Add hashtab support for bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Fixes: 818e00848227 ("bpf: Implement iteration ops for resizable hashtab")
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 5 +++++
kernel/bpf/states.c | 3 +++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 112ca1511da4..816948df8fff 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h@@ -379,6 +379,11 @@ struct bpf_func_state { bool in_async_callback_fn; bool in_exception_callback_fn; bool no_stack_arg_load; + /* + * The helper invokes this callback under rcu_read_lock(), so the + * callback and its callees run in an RCU read-side critical section. + */ + bool in_rcu_callback_fn; /* For callback calling functions that limit number of possible * callback executions (e.g. bpf_loop) keeps track of current * simulated iteration number.
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/states.c b/kernel/bpf/states.c
index 953700822fa7..b3d250caaaa6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/states.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/states.c@@ -995,6 +995,9 @@ static bool func_states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_stat if (!old->no_stack_arg_load && cur->no_stack_arg_load) return false; + if (old->in_rcu_callback_fn != cur->in_rcu_callback_fn) + return false; + for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) if (((1 << i) & live_regs) && !regsafe(env, &old->regs[i], &cur->regs[i],
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index ddfa0c6d2755..883cf148235c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c@@ -11530,6 +11530,19 @@ static int set_map_elem_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, if (err) return err; + switch (map->map_type) { + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH: + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH: + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH: + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH: + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_RHASH: + /* Hash tables run the callback under rcu_read_lock(). */ + callee->in_rcu_callback_fn = true; + break; + default: + break; + } + callee->in_callback_fn = true; callee->callback_ret_range = retval_range(0, 1); return 0;
@@ -12273,10 +12286,22 @@ int bpf_get_helper_proto(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, return *ptr && (*ptr)->func ? 0 : -EINVAL; } +/* Is any frame on the current path a callback that runs under RCU? */ +static bool in_rcu_callback(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i <= state->curframe; i++) + if (state->frame[i]->in_rcu_callback_fn) + return true; + return false; +} + /* Check if we're in a sleepable context. */ static inline bool in_sleepable_context(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { - return !in_rcu_cs(env); + return !in_rcu_cs(env) && !in_rcu_callback(env); } static const char *non_sleepable_context_description(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
@@ -12290,6 +12315,7 @@ static const char *non_sleepable_context_description(struct bpf_verifier_env *en return "IRQ-disabled region"; if (env->cur_state->active_locks) return "lock region"; + return "callback running under rcu_read_lock"; } return "non-sleepable prog"; }
--
2.55.0