Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] Netfilter/IPVS updates for net-next

Florian Westphal [off-list ref] wrote:

Pablo Neira Ayuso [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

sashiko reports:

"If an IPv4 packet from an AF_INET socket is encapsulated by an IPv6 tunnel,
the tunnel preserves the AF_INET socket in skb->sk while transmitting the
outer IPv6 packet on the LOCAL_OUT path."

This sounds like an unrelated issue, I don't know yet how that can
happen TBH.

I'm stupid and I don't understand why this would be a regression.

This change makes things stricter, so it doesn't enable anything that
wasn't allowed before, how does this add a new crash regression? :-(

Please toss this patch. Lets ignore this problem.