On 2026-10-09 13:31:17 [+0200], Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
quoted
As far as I am aware, there aren't really any guarantees on the
context of a USB URB-completion callback. The kerneldoc for struct urb
in include/linux/usb.h says "The completion callback is made
in_interrupt()", but that is most definitely out of date.
I don't think so, I think some platforms still have those callbacks in
irq context, unless we changed to threaded irq handlers everywhere? I
could have missed that, but we should still write the callbacks to
assume that and then we should be fine even if we aren't in irq context,
right?
The HCD invokes the completion callback usually in IRQ context. I think
the VHCI is an exception here.
For the forced-threaded mode we disable BH before the IRQ handler is
invoked. I think even dummy_hcd invokes them from the timer if my memory
is right.
quoted
Drivers shouldn't rely on any particular context guarantees. Not even
whether local irqs are enabled/disabled.
Agreed.
I would suggest to make VHCI invoke the completion callback with BH
disabled. usbnet's tx_complete() does also defer_bh() which schedules a
BH worker via queue_work(). While this works without disabling BH it
leads to waking ksoftirqd and an additional context switch which we
could avoid by dealing with it directly.
thanks,
greg k-h
Sebastian