Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/2] docs: netmem: document netmem and memory provider design principles
flat view
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-10-08 13:15:50
Also in:
bpf, linux-doc, lkml
On 10/5/26 01:49, Mina Almasry wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add a Design Principles section to Documentation/networking/netmem.rst covering the netmem_ref abstraction, the prohibition on direct downcasting in callers, decoupling memory providers from net_iov, decoupling net_iov from unreadability, delegating provider/type logic to memory_provider_ops and netmem helpers, and the homogeneous skb fragment memory type invariant. Cc: Luigi Rizzo <redacted> Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org> Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me> Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <redacted> --- Documentation/networking/netmem.rst | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netmem.rst b/Documentation/networking/netmem.rst index 217869d1108dd..57e52a947663d 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/netmem.rst +++ b/Documentation/networking/netmem.rst@@ -19,6 +19,52 @@ Benefits of Netmem : * Simplified Development: Drivers interact with a consistent API, regardless of the underlying memory implementation. +Design Principles +================= + +Memory providers (or the default ``page_pool`` allocator) allocate underlying +memory (``struct net_iov`` or ``struct page``), cast it to ``netmem_ref``, and +supply it to ``page_pool``. The ``page_pool``, drivers, and networking stack +operate on ``netmem_ref`` as the abstract type. Existing ``page_pool`` APIs +that allocate or free ``struct page`` are legacy compatibility wrappers for +drivers that do not yet support ``netmem_ref``. Code that is not yet +``netmem``-aware should be converted to ``netmem_ref`` unless it will never +need to support ``netmem``. + +1. **Operate on netmem_ref, do not downcast**: ``page_pool``, drivers, and the + core networking stack should deal with ``netmem_ref`` rather than + ``struct net_iov`` or ``struct page``. Downcasting ``netmem_ref`` to + ``struct net_iov`` or ``struct page`` is not allowed unless a code path + strictly cannot function without knowing the underlying memory type (for + example, ``kmap_local_page()``). In those cases, to keep call sites simple, + add a ``netmem`` helper that performs the operation on behalf of the caller, + cleanly handles all ``net_iov`` and ``page`` cases, and returns an error if + the ``netmem`` type cannot support the requested operation. + +2. **Decouple memory providers from net_iov**: Memory providers are not limited + to ``struct net_iov``. A memory provider that returns ``struct page``-backed + ``netmem_ref``\ s to upper layers is allowed. Code must not assume that using + a memory provider implies ``net_iov`` memory. + +3. **Decouple net_iov from unreadability**: ``struct net_iov`` is flexible and + has no inherent restrictions. While current ``net_iov`` implementations are + unreadable by the CPU, future readable ``net_iov`` implementations are + allowed. Code must not assume ``net_iov`` is unreadable; check readability + via ``netmem_address()`` or ``skb_frags_readable()`` instead. + +4. **Delegate complexity to the lowest layer**: Each layer must respect its + abstraction boundary. ``page_pool`` must not implement per-memory-provider + custom logic in its main code; instead, it delegates provider-specific + handling to ``struct memory_provider_ops``. Similarly, core networking code + should avoid per-``netmem``-type branching and instead delegate operations + to ``netmem`` helpers that handle the underlying memory type. + +5. **Homogeneous skb fragment memory types**: An ``sk_buff``'s ``frags[]`` are + always backed by ``netmem_ref``\ s of the same memory type. Mixing fragments + from different memory types within a single ``sk_buff`` is not allowed, + keeping ``sk_buff`` handling simple. Consequently, coalescing ``sk_buff``\ s + with different fragment memory types must not happen.
Would be good to expand on what's the memory type here. We have netmem vs net_iov, and there are different memory provider types, but we need to restrict it even further, sth in the lines of "if an skb contains a frag from a memory provider, all its frags should be belong to the same memory provider". Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> -- Pavel Begunkov