[PATCH ipsec v4 7/9] xfrm: include mark in MIGRATE_STATE SA collision check
flat view
COOLING10d
SUPERSEDED
From: Antony Antony <hidden>
Date: 2026-10-06 07:06:28
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml
Subsystem:
networking [general], networking [ipsec], the rest · Maintainers:
"David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Steffen Klassert, Herbert Xu, Linus Torvalds
Revision v4 of 3 in this series.
Revisions (3)
- v1 [diff vs current]
- v4 current
- v5 [diff vs current]
The SA lookup tuple is (daddr, spi, proto, family, mark), but the
EEXIST pre-check and the xfrm_state_insert() vs xfrm_state_add()
decision only considered daddr and family, ignoring mark.
A migration that only changes the mark inserts a duplicate SA tuple
into the hash tables.
The collision check is implemented as xfrm_state_mark_collides(),
which walks the SPI hash bucket for the target tuple and excludes the
state being migrated by pointer, rather than doing a separate
exact-match lookup followed by a wildcard lookup and comparing the
result against self.
Before:
root@west:~# ip xfrm state add src 10.1.1.1 dst 10.1.1.2 proto esp \
spi 0x1000 reqid 100 mode tunnel aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" \
0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 96 \
mark 0x1 mask 0xff
root@west:~# ip xfrm state add src 10.1.1.1 dst 10.1.1.2 proto esp \
spi 0x1000 reqid 100 mode tunnel aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" \
0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 96 \
mark 0x2 mask 0xff
root@west:~# ip xfrm state migrate dst 10.1.1.2 proto esp spi 0x1000 \
mark 0x1 mask 0xff \
new-dst 10.1.1.2 new-src 10.1.1.1 new-reqid 100 \
new-mark 0x2 mask 0xff
ip x s
src 10.1.1.1 dst 10.1.1.2
proto esp spi 0x00001000 reqid 100 mode tunnel
replay-window 0
mark 0x2/0xff
aead rfc4106(gcm(aes)) 0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 96
anti-replay context: seq 0x0, oseq 0x0, bitmap 0x00000000
src 10.1.1.1 dst 10.1.1.2
proto esp spi 0x00001000 reqid 100 mode tunnel
replay-window 0
mark 0x2/0xff
aead rfc4106(gcm(aes)) 0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 96
anti-replay context: seq 0x0, oseq 0x0, bitmap 0x00000000
sel src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0
Notice two states with same mark 0x2/0xff.
After:
Error: New SA tuple already occupied.
Fixes: a9d155ea9b44 ("xfrm: add XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE for single SA migration")
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <redacted>
---
v1->v2: pre-check used wildcard lookup; factored the check into
xfrm_state_mark_collides() excluding self directly instead of
lookup_exact()+lookup() with a pointer comparison
---
include/net/xfrm.h | 4 ++++
net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 17 ++++++++---------
3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index 9e053388aa4b..26dd4b570588 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h@@ -1751,6 +1751,10 @@ struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_lookup_byaddr(struct net *net, u32 mark, struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_lookup_exact(struct net *net, const struct xfrm_mark *mark, const xfrm_address_t *daddr, __be32 spi, u8 proto, unsigned short family); +bool xfrm_state_mark_collides(struct net *net, u32 mark, + const xfrm_address_t *daddr, __be32 spi, + u8 proto, unsigned short family, + const struct xfrm_state *self); #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_SUB_POLICY void xfrm_tmpl_sort(struct xfrm_tmpl **dst, struct xfrm_tmpl **src, int n, unsigned short family);
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index f1e04df8d501..65663c7ba836 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c@@ -2202,10 +2202,12 @@ int xfrm_state_migrate_install(const struct xfrm_state *x, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) { if (m->new_family == m->old_family && - xfrm_addr_equal(&x->id.daddr, &m->new_daddr, m->new_family)) { + xfrm_addr_equal(&x->id.daddr, &m->new_daddr, m->new_family) && + xc->mark.v == x->mark.v && xc->mark.m == x->mark.m) { /* - * Care is needed when the destination address of the state is - * to be updated as it is a part of triplet. + * Care is needed when the destination address or mark of the + * state is to be updated, as they are part of the lookup + * triplet. */ xfrm_state_insert(xc); } else {
@@ -2440,6 +2442,38 @@ xfrm_state_lookup_exact(struct net *net, const struct xfrm_mark *mark, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_lookup_exact); +/* True if some OTHER state at this tuple would wildcard-match "mark". + * Used by MIGRATE_STATE, which must exclude the state being migrated. + */ +bool xfrm_state_mark_collides(struct net *net, u32 mark, + const xfrm_address_t *daddr, __be32 spi, + u8 proto, unsigned short family, + const struct xfrm_state *self) +{ + struct xfrm_hash_state_ptrs state_ptrs; + unsigned int h; + struct xfrm_state *x; + bool collides = false; + + rcu_read_lock(); + xfrm_hash_ptrs_get(net, &state_ptrs); + h = __xfrm_spi_hash(daddr, spi, proto, family, state_ptrs.hmask); + + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(x, state_ptrs.byspi + h, byspi) { + if (x != self && x->props.family == family && + x->id.spi == spi && x->id.proto == proto && + xfrm_addr_equal(&x->id.daddr, daddr, family) && + (mark & x->mark.m) == x->mark.v) { + collides = true; + break; + } + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return collides; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_mark_collides); + struct xfrm_state * xfrm_find_acq(struct net *net, const struct xfrm_mark *mark, u8 mode, u32 reqid, u32 if_id, u32 pcpu_num, u8 proto, const xfrm_address_t *daddr,
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index 4de8c401eb44..a5fbe38839c4 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c@@ -3476,15 +3476,14 @@ static int xfrm_do_migrate_state(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, x->nat_keepalive_interval); if (m.new_family != um->id.family || - !xfrm_addr_equal(&m.new_daddr, &um->id.daddr, um->id.family)) { - u32 new_mark_key = m.new_mark ? m.new_mark->v & m.new_mark->m : - m.old_mark.v & m.old_mark.m; - struct xfrm_state *x_new; - - x_new = xfrm_state_lookup(net, new_mark_key, &m.new_daddr, - um->id.spi, um->id.proto, m.new_family); - if (x_new) { - xfrm_state_put(x_new); + !xfrm_addr_equal(&m.new_daddr, &um->id.daddr, um->id.family) || + (m.new_mark && (m.new_mark->v != x->mark.v || + m.new_mark->m != x->mark.m))) { + const struct xfrm_mark *new_mark = m.new_mark ? m.new_mark : &x->mark; + + if (xfrm_state_mark_collides(net, new_mark->v & new_mark->m, + &m.new_daddr, um->id.spi, + um->id.proto, m.new_family, x)) { NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "New SA tuple already occupied"); err = -EEXIST; goto out;
--
2.47.3