Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 3 authors, 8d ago

Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] selftests: net: migrate AF_XDP test suite over to net

flat view

From: Stanislav Fomichev <hidden>
Date: 2026-10-05 18:06:57
Also in: bpf

On 10/01, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Hi,

This work moves the AF_XDP test suite over to selftests/net and adds
a hardware test on top of the python-based drv-net infrastructure.
Since a non-zero effort went into implementing xskxceiver's (not so
great testing app name) test cases, we did not want to completely
abandon it and start everything from scratch within different infra.
However, hooking it up to the networking CI will allow us to run
cyclic tests on real HW; before that, all of our HW tests were manual
local runs.

Tests were based on a process with two threads responsible for the RX
and TX paths, whereas the new infra expects two separate processes for
the DUT and remote side, where each side has either rx or tx role.

To satisfy this requirement, this series makes each xskxceiver endpoint
a process of its own, so that the RX and TX sides of a case can run on
different hosts, and adds drivers/net/hw/xsk.py, which runs the existing
test cases with the DUT in zero-copy mode against an SKB-mode xskxceiver
on a remote host. The veth test keeps its cases and moves with the
engine from selftests/bpf to selftests/net.

ZC tests used to expect a single NIC in loopback mode, with both
sockets on one of its queues sharing a UMEM. Now we step away from it:
the DUT and the remote are separate hosts, and an ntuple rule steers
the test traffic to the AF_XDP queue.

The remote endpoint is xskxceiver in SKB mode rather than a plain
socket, so both ends keep sharing the packet stream generation and
validation of the existing cases. This reduces the need for remote
interface being a NIC from narrow set of NICs that are AF_XDP ZC
capable.

This implies that during the test run only one side is actually
exercised, so let's introduce the concept of direction per test case.
For example, this means SEND_RECEIVE in XSK_HW_RX will test
ice_clean_rx_irq_zc() routine and in XSK_HW_TX the ice_xmit_zc().

BPF's 'test_progs -t xsk' is removed, as well as single interface mode,
which was used for ZC tests. BPF CI therefore no longer runs the
xskxceiver cases. test_xsk.sh is kept, as it is the only run that needs
no hardware and not all tests are currently covered by the HW test side.
We can decide whether to keep the delta test cases, drop them or somehow
enable within HW tests.

Thread-based approach had a pacing mechanism that was a simple in-flight
packet counter updated within critical section by both ends.
Process-based way now is going to do this pacing via xsk_peer.

xsk_peer, the control channel, carries three fixed-size messages: READY
is the barrier between steps, PROGRESS tells TX how many packets RX has
consumed so that TX does not overrun the RX UMEM, and ABORT stops the
peer after a failure.

test_xsk_case_defs.h lists each case with the DUT directions.
xskxceiver builds its test table from that file, and xsk.py parses it to
make the variants ksft_variants() named rx_<case> and tx_<case>, so -l,
-t and -T work as for any other test.


Patches 1-3 prepare the split. Patch 1 moves the endpoint work out of
the pthread entry points. Patches 2 and 3 drop the single-interface
loopback mode and the test_progs wrapper, which runs both endpoints as
threads of test_progs; neither can work with one endpoint per process.
Nothing else runs a subset of the cases, so patch 3 also merges the
cases that the wrapper left out into the main list.

Patch 4 adds a generic rule for BPF skeletons to net/bpf.mk, as Jakub
suggested in the review of the xdp_features move [0]; xskxceiver is
its first user. If that series lands first with the same rule, this
patch can be dropped.

Patch 5 moves the engine, its XDP program and the veth launcher to
selftests/net. xsk.py needs xskxceiver, and a drv-net test can only
rely on net/lib: the selftests build pulls net/lib in for net,
drivers/net and drivers/net/hw, while it skips selftests/bpf by
default. The veth test is software-only, so it goes to selftests/net,
as the drv-net README asks. selftests/bpf keeps building xsk.c from
its new place for xdp_hw_metadata and the xdp_metadata test.

Patches 6-9 split the engine. The interface capabilities move into one
struct, so that a process can mirror them for the endpoint it does not
own (6). main() is split into setup, run and cleanup (7). xskxceiver
runs one case per invocation, and test_xsk.sh owns the mode x case
matrix (8). Finally, the RX and TX endpoints become separate processes
that meet over a small TCP control channel (9).

Patch 10 adds the xskxceiver options that a two-host run needs.
Patch 11 moves the case list into test_xsk_case_defs.h, so that
xsk.py can read it as well, and patch 12 adds xsk.py on top of them.
Patch 13 documents both setups.


Tested with back-to-back ice NICs connected between separate hosts, with
following net.config:

NETIF=ens785f1np1
LOCAL_V4=192.168.100.1
REMOTE_V4=192.168.100.2
REMOTE_TYPE=ssh
REMOTE_ARGS=mfijalko@hostname
XSK_REMOTE_BIN=/home/mfijalko/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/xskxceiver
XSK_REMOTE_SUDO=1


Known issues:
- Every case pays for process start-up, XDP attach and detach and, on
  hardware, its remote commands. We used to configure resources once
  and then execute the whole test suite; it doesn't seem to be
  CI-friendly and it is preferred to have each case's resource
  management separated; that on the other hand increases the
  execution time of the whole test suite.
[..]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
- The XDP programs redirect every packet, so the link under test must
  carry no other traffic. SSH and the control channel go to the
  REMOTE_ARGS host, which has to be reached over another link.
Will this work on NIPA?

I took a quick pass, nothing pops us for me. The only thing I'm not sure
is the bpftool dependency (whether we need to build it or there is
something on the system). It looks like NIPA failed to apply and run it,
so maybe address 'redirect every packet' and rebase+repost? As long as
it passes HW tests we should be good :-)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help