Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: hsr: shrink seqnr_lock to sequence counter updates
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2026-09-23 10:37:33
Also in:
linux-kselftest, lkml, stable
On 2026-08-09 14:14:52 [+0200], Xin Xie wrote:
Commit 06afd2c31d33 ("hsr: Synchronize sending frames to have always
incremented outgoing seq nr.") and commit 430d67bdcb04 ("net: hsr: Use
the seqnr lock for frames received via interlink port.") hold
seqnr_lock across the whole forwarding path. Transmitting while
holding the lock can create lock-dependency issues when HSR devices
are stacked with other net devices, up to a real deadlock (see
Reported-by/Closes).
Since commit aae9d6b616b5 ("hsr: Implement more robust duplicate
discard for HSR"), duplicate discard is order-independent (sparse
bitmaps), so only the sequence counter updates need serialization.
Limit seqnr_lock to the counter updates in handle_std_frame(); the
master TX path (hsr_dev_xmit()) and the interlink RX path
(hsr_handle_frame()) drop their outer lock, and the supervision frame
builders release it right after their counter update.
Concurrent forwarding may emit frames out of allocation order, which
sparse-bitmap discard tolerates. The master/interlink tx statistics are
no longer serialized; consistent per-cpu/per-queue statistics for all
HSR paths are handled in a separate series.This fix relies on the bitmap seq nr handling while the Fixes commits below do not have it. Doesn't this revert the synchronisation change leading to the problem it tried to solve at least in the stable kernels?
Fixes: 06afd2c31d33 ("hsr: Synchronize sending frames to have always incremented outgoing seq nr.")
Fixes: 430d67bdcb04 ("net: hsr: Use the seqnr lock for frames received via interlink port.")
Reported-by: syzbot+fbf74291c3b7e753b481@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=fbf74291c3b7e753b481
Cc: <redacted> # aae9d6b616b5: hsr: Implement more robust duplicate discard for HSR
Signed-off-by: Xin Xie <redacted>Sebastian