Re: b53.rst: is the 5325/5365 "no tagging support" section still accurate?

Hi Christian,

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 7:48 PM Christian Melendez [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Jonas,

Thanks for confirming!

Quick follow-up on the "configuration examples look horribly outdated"
part. Once 5325/5365 move to the tagging-supported section, the single
port/bridge/gateway examples further down only apply to 539x/531x5. Were
those outdated specifically for 5325/5365, or wrong in general?

Looking at Documentation/networking/dsa/configuration.rst, which has
similar examples, the configuration examples are actually part of the
"without tagging support" section.

And since "without tagging support" doesn't apply to any b53 switches
anymore, the whole section and the configuration examples can be
dropped, and it doesn't matter anymore whether this is (still) valid
configuration or not ;-)

Best regards,
Jonas