On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 08:11:04AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 2:12 PM [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
...
I agree that this is a pre-existing bug, but I wouldn't fix it in this
patch. I would probably introduce yet another patch to resolve it.
By my count we have 3 pre-existing issues that aren't directly related
to the original problem. If possible I would prefer to address them
separately, otherwise I can tack on 3 additional diffs to the set and
resubmit.
Yes, I agree that is a good approach.
I think that in the age of AI-generated reviews finding related bugs it is
best to adhere to a strict scope for a patch(set) combined with follow-up
fixes. Else a patchset may drown in scope creep.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
...