Re: [PATCH net v2] r8169: don't enable chip LTR when the platform has not enabled LTR
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-09-11 13:14:45
Also in:
lkml
On 11.09.2026 15:00, Yogesh Gaur wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 1:03 AM Heiner Kallweit [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 10.09.2026 15:01, Yogesh Gaur wrote:quoted
rtl_enable_ltr() programs the MAC to generate LTR messages - ALDPS_LTR_EN,Empty lines, mail formatting issue?Yes, I would correct it in v3.quoted
quoted
LTR_SNOOP_EN, LTR_OBFF_LOCK_EN, plus LINK_SPEED_CHANGE_EN on RTL8125/RTL8126/RTL8127 - and rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable() calls it on every ASPM enable, then goes on to let the chip trigger L1.2. The only gate is tp->aspm_manageable, which records that the OS is allowed to control ASPM. It says nothing about LTR. LTR is a separate PCIe capability that only works if every device on the path to the root port supports it. The PCI core works that out in pci_configure_ltr() and records the result in pci_dev->ltr_path; per PCIe r6.0 sec 7.5.3.16 a function must not issue LTR messages while LTR Mechanism Enable is clear. So on a platform whose hierarchy has no LTR path, the driver tells the chip to start sending LTR messages nothing will honour, and ties ALDPS - the PHY's link-down power saving - to them. A report against RTL8125B (rev 05, firmware rtl8125b-2_0.0.2) in a mini PC shows the effect: 291Did you verify that this is caused by LTR messages, and not by any other root cause?quoted
link down/up transitions in one eight-hour boot, with repeated downshifts to 100Mbps, against four transitions at boot and then a stable link on the kernel before the LTR change. Gate the chip's LTR programming on pci_dev->ltr_path. That field lives inside CONFIG_PCIEASPM, and without ASPM support there is nothing here to enable LTR for, so compile the function out in that configuration. Note this does change CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n builds, which used to program chip LTR unconditionally: pci_disable_link_state() is a stub that returns success there, so tp->aspm_manageable ends up set. The PCI core does not configure LTR in that configuration either. Fixes: 9ab94a32af70 ("r8169: enable LTR support") Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2529752Did you verify that your patch fixes the reported issue? Or do you just assume this? Because in the bug comment history I don't see a statement that issue has been resolved.I don't have a board with me, hence have not verified it. I did a compile check only.
If it's not verified that your patch fixes the reported issue, better remove the Closes line.
quoted
quoted
Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com> --- v2: - Gate on pci_dev->ltr_path instead of reading PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2 directly, and compile rtl_enable_ltr() out for CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n, where that field does not exist and there is nothing to enable LTR for. Suggested by Heiner Kallweit. - Commit message notes the resulting change for CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n builds. - No change to the RTL8125 register programming itself. v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260909110554.1977-1-yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com/ (local) drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c index ec4fc21fa21f..05f7a44aff01 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c@@ -3035,8 +3035,16 @@ static void rtl_disable_exit_l1(struct rtl8169_private *tp) } } +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp) { + /* The chip must not issue LTR messages unless LTR is enabled on the + * whole path up to the root port. pci_configure_ltr() works that out + * and records the result in pci_dev->ltr_path. + */ + if (!tp->pci_dev->ltr_path)Simpler would be: if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEASPM) || !tp->pci_dev->ltr_path)I tried that and it does not build, because ltr_path itself is declared inside the #ifdef: include/linux/pci.h:443 #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM struct pcie_link_state *link_state; unsigned int aspm_l0s_support:1; unsigned int aspm_l1_support:1; unsigned int ltr_path:1; #endif IS_ENABLED() is a C expression, so the member reference still has to compile even when the left operand is 0: drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c: In function 'rtl_enable_ltr': error: 'struct pci_dev' has no member named 'ltr_path' if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEASPM) || !tp->pci_dev->ltr_path)
Right, ofc ..
quoted
Then you don't need the stub function.You are right that the stub function should go, though. v3 drops it and keeps a single rtl_enable_ltr() with the guard inline: static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp) { /* comment */ #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM if (!tp->pci_dev->ltr_path) return; #else return; #endif
LGTM
quoted
quoted
+ return; + switch (tp->mac_version) { case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80: r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd0, 0x9003);@@ -3120,6 +3128,11 @@ static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp) /* chip can trigger LTR */ r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, LTR_OBFF_LOCK, 0x0003, LTR_OBFF_LOCK_EN); } +#else +static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp) +{ +} +#endif static void rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(struct rtl8169_private *tp, bool enable) {