Re: [PATCH net-next V4 11/14] net/mlx5e: psp: Dynamically reconfigure based on SHAMPO mode
From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Date: 2026-09-10 21:54:37
Also in:
linux-kselftest, linux-rdma, lkml
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0 - [Medium] In mlx5e_update_nic_rx() (drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c:6289-6300) the… -- net/mlx5e: psp: Dynamically reconfigure based on SHAMPO mode This adds an mlx5e_update_nic_rx() -> mlx5e_accel_update_rx() -> mlx5e_psp_update_rx() hook so PSP steering can switch between standard and decap modes when the SHAMPO mode changes. It also enables decap at fs creation time when shampo_enabled() says so.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/psp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/psp.c index 84133cbf8689..c40d2ddf6af2 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/psp.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/psp.c
[ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1355,3 +1363,14 @@ void mlx5e_psp_cleanup(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) priv->psp = NULL; kfree(psp); } + +void mlx5e_psp_update_rx(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) +{ + struct mlx5e_psp *psp = priv->psp; + + netdev_assert_locked(priv->netdev); + if (!psp || !psp->fs->check.ft) + return; + + accel_psp_fs_rx_reconfigure(psp->fs, shampo_enabled(priv)); +}
[ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c index fc110a7d16e8..b5449d849838 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c@@ -6288,7 +6288,15 @@ static void mlx5e_nic_disable(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) static int mlx5e_update_nic_rx(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) { - return mlx5e_refresh_tirs(priv->mdev, false, false); + int err; + + err = mlx5e_refresh_tirs(priv->mdev, false, false); + if (err) + return err; + + mlx5e_accel_update_rx(priv); + + return 0; }
[Severity: Medium]
Should the new PSP hook be gated on the TIR refresh result? The two
operations look unrelated (TIR self-loopback refresh versus the PSP check
rule destination), so a failing mlx5e_refresh_tirs() now also skips the PSP
steering reconfiguration.
mlx5e_refresh_tirs() does have reachable failure modes on devices where
MLX5_CAP_GEN(mdev, tis_tir_td_order) is 0, since it then calls
mlx5e_modify_tirs_lb() in en_common.c, which returns -ENOMEM when
mlx5e_tir_builder_alloc() fails and otherwise propagates the MODIFY_TIR
firmware error:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_common.c:mlx5e_modify_tirs_lb() {
builder = mlx5e_tir_builder_alloc(true);
if (!builder)
return -ENOMEM;
...
err = mlx5e_tir_modify(tir, builder);
if (err) {
...
break;
}
The live reconfiguration caller does not look at the return value either,
and it has already committed the new channel params by then:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c:mlx5e_switch_priv_channels() {
priv->channels = *new_chs;
...
priv->profile->update_rx(priv);
...
mlx5e_activate_priv_channels(priv);
}
In that case the datapath runs with the new packet_merge.type while
fs->decap_enabled still reflects the old mode, and nothing re-evaluates it,
because shampo_enabled() is only consulted from mlx5e_psp_update_rx() and
accel_psp_fs_create(). When SHAMPO has just been enabled the PSP check rule
keeps pointing at fs->rx.ft rather than fs->decap.ft, so HW GRO for PSP stays
unavailable, and unlike accel_psp_fs_rx_reconfigure()'s own error path there
is no mlx5_core_warn() to indicate it.
The RX path itself appears to tolerate the mismatch, since
mlx5e_psp_is_decap() keys off the per-CQE flow tag and en_rx.c flushes the
SHAMPO session for non-decap PSP packets, and the state self-heals on the
next channel switch or open. Would calling mlx5e_accel_update_rx(priv)
unconditionally, or before mlx5e_refresh_tirs(), be preferable here?
This condition is still present at the end of the series
(a9e41034d482a6cbfe0487f9ed8050c5bf5c3ce1), where mlx5e_update_nic_rx() is
unchanged.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260908065244.3799142-1-tariqt%40nvidia.com