Re: [PATCH net v2] net/smc: fix abort_work termination in smc_conn_free()
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: 2026-09-10 10:50:17
Also in:
linux-s390, sashiko-reviews
On 9/9/26 8:48 AM, Hidayath Khan wrote:
On 08/09/26 5:17 pm, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:quoted
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: Pre-existing issues: - [Critical] Late-queued `tx_work` can execute on a freed socket because it does not hold a socket reference, causing a use-after-free. --Thanks for the Sashiko AI review. The finding is correct. tx_work is the only one of the three connection work items with no socket reference: close_work sock_hold smc_cdc.c:420 sock_put smc_close.c:444 abort_work sock_hold smc_cdc.c:324 sock_put smc_core.c:1754 tx_work none none The link group holds a reference while the connection is registered, which is what hides this. smc_conn_free() drops it in smc_lgr_unregister_conn() and never cancels tx_work - it only cancels abort_work - and the link group usually outlives the socket, so lgr->tx_wq is still there to run an item that was queued late. Worth noting the fix in this patch does not transfer. conn->freed works for abort_work because abort_work holds a reference, so the socket is alive and the flag is safe to read. tx_work holds nothing, so by the time it runs there may be no conn to test. It needs the missing reference rather than a guard: sock_hold() at the three queue sites, sock_put() in smc_tx_work(), and the reference returned at the cancel sites that report they removed a pending item. I will send that separately, since it is a different work item and a different fix. This patch is unchanged.
Could you please have a look at clashiko report, too? that looks correct, too and more strictly tied to the issue addressed here. Also note that netdev-wise the most relevant sashiko instance is the nipa/clashiko one, as it includes reports/reviews/findings from the public clashiko instance. /P