Re: [PATCH net v2 06/15] mptcp: prevent race between disconnect() and rtx
From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Date: 2026-09-09 14:49:37
Also in:
lkml, mptcp, stable
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider: Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 2 - [Low] The commit message of "mptcp: prevent race between disconnect() and rtx" describes the change as only "Prevent the race using the… - [Low] The commit carries "Fixes: b29fcfb54cd7 (\"mptcp: full disconnect implementation\")" (v5.18) for a real race that can leave a reused msk… -- mptcp: prevent race between disconnect() and rtx This replaces the mptcp_stop_rtx_timer() and mptcp_stop_tout_timer() calls in mptcp_disconnect() with open-coded sk_stop_timer_sync() calls, so a concurrently running retransmit timer cannot resurrect state after the disconnect path has reset it. No Link: or Closes: tags are present in the commit header. A couple of questions below, one about the changelog and one about the tags.
mptcp: prevent race between disconnect() and rtx
Sashiko noted that the two event can race, leading to inconsistent
status. Prevent the race using the synchronous timer stop operation.
Fixes: b29fcfb54cd7 ("mptcp: full disconnect implementation")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni [off-list ref][Severity: Low] The Fixes: tag points at b29fcfb54cd7, which went in during v5.18, and the race described can leave a reused msk with MPTCP_RETRANSMIT / MPTCP_WORK_RTX set after mptcp_disconnect() has already cleared msk->flags and msk->cb_flags. Should this also carry Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org? Most of the other fixes in this series do, including "mptcp: do not reschedule the RTX timer for fallback sockets", whose MPTCP_RTX_ENABLED bit this change relies on so the timer cannot be re-armed once the socket is in TCP_CLOSE. Also, the report is credited to "Sashiko" in prose only. Would it be possible to add the matching Closes: or Link: tag, the way the sibling commits in the series do?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c index be59651e708e..d611af2eb74f 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c@@ -3588,6 +3588,7 @@ static void mptcp_destroy_common(struct mptcp_sock *msk) static int mptcp_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags) { + struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk); struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk); /* We are on the fastopen error path. We can't call straight into the@@ -3600,8 +3601,13 @@ static int mptcp_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags) mptcp_check_listen_stop(sk); mptcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE); - mptcp_stop_rtx_timer(sk); - mptcp_stop_tout_timer(sk); + /* The later subflow close can not kick again the tout timer, + * as the msk is already in closed status. + */ + msk->timer_ival = icsk->icsk_rto_min; + sk_stop_timer_sync(sk, &sk->mptcp_retransmit_timer); + icsk->icsk_mtup.probe_timestamp = 0; + sk_stop_timer_sync(sk, &icsk->mptcp_tout_timer);
[Severity: Low]
The changelog says the race is prevented "using the synchronous timer stop
operation", which reads like a straight sk_stop_timer() to sk_stop_timer_sync()
swap, but the open-coded version in mptcp_disconnect() also changes two other
pieces of state. Could the message mention them?
First, msk->timer_ival now ends up as icsk->icsk_rto_min, while the helper it
replaces sets it to zero:
net/mptcp/protocol.c:mptcp_stop_rtx_timer() {
sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->mptcp_retransmit_timer);
mptcp_sk(sk)->timer_ival = 0;
}
The new value is what __mptcp_init_sock() seeds, so it looks intentional and
harmless, and the only reader, mptcp_reset_rtx_timer(), is gated on
MPTCP_RTX_ENABLED which mptcp_set_state(TCP_CLOSE) has just cleared. Is that
the reasoning?
Second, the tout timer is now stopped and probe_timestamp cleared
unconditionally, whereas the replaced helper bailed out early when
probe_timestamp was already zero:
net/mptcp/protocol.h:mptcp_stop_tout_timer() {
if (!inet_csk(sk)->icsk_mtup.probe_timestamp)
return;
sk_stop_timer(sk, &inet_csk(sk)->mptcp_tout_timer);
inet_csk(sk)->icsk_mtup.probe_timestamp = 0;
}
That early return means a tout timer armed only for an MP_FAIL timeout, where
mptcp_reset_tout_timer() left probe_timestamp at zero, stayed pending across
disconnect(). Is that a separate fix folded in here, and would it be worth
calling out in the changelog so stable backporters can see it?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260908-net-mptcp-misc-fixes-7-3-rc1-v2-0-df1de70348b6%40kernel.org