Re: [PATCH net v5 1/2] mptcp: hold MP_JOIN msk ref when cloning reqsk
From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Date: 2026-09-06 13:02:30
Also in:
mptcp
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider: Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 2 (1) - [Low] mptcp_subflow_reqsk_clone() (net/mptcp/subflow.c:50-79) performs a lockless dereference of a possibly recycled SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU… - [Low] mptcp_subflow_reqsk_clone() (net/mptcp/subflow.c:66-76) uses the fully relaxed refcount_inc_not_zero() to take a reference on an object… Pre-existing issues: - [Low] Incomplete clone fixup for MP_CAPABLE token ownership: inet_reqsk_clone() byte-copies the whole mptcp_subflow_request_sock… -- mptcp: hold MP_JOIN msk ref when cloning reqsk TCP request migration byte-copies subflow_req->msk into the cloned request without taking a reference, so both requests can drop the same msk reference. This adds mptcp_subflow_reqsk_clone(), called from inet_reqsk_clone(), which conditionally acquires a reference for the clone and re-validates the pointer, and marks the ownership-transfer store in subflow_syn_recv_sock() with WRITE_ONCE(). Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260804095051.715355-1-david.lee@trailofbits.com/ (local)
quoted hunk
diff --git a/include/net/mptcp.h b/include/net/mptcp.h index 485d55b66ea67..8e063454fcf6e 100644 --- a/include/net/mptcp.h +++ b/include/net/mptcp.h@@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ int mptcp_subflow_init_cookie_req(struct request_sock *req, struct request_sock *mptcp_subflow_reqsk_alloc(const struct request_sock_ops *ops, struct sock *sk_listener, bool attach_listener); +void mptcp_subflow_reqsk_clone(struct request_sock *req, + struct request_sock *new_req);
[Severity: Low]
Would it be worth documenting the calling-context requirement here?
The safety of mptcp_subflow_reqsk_clone() depends on the caller being in an
RCU read-side critical section, because the msk it dereferences comes from a
SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU cache. That requirement is only stated in a comment
inside net/mptcp/subflow.c; the prototype and the !CONFIG_MPTCP stub in
include/net/mptcp.h say nothing about it, and there is no
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() or lockdep_assert_in_softirq() in the helper itself.
All three inet_reqsk_clone() call sites satisfy it only implicitly:
reqsk_timer_handler() runs in the rsk_timer softirq,
inet_csk_complete_hashdance() runs in NET_RX softirq, and
inet_csk_listen_stop() is inside local_bh_disable(). In the last case the
explicit rcu_read_lock() is taken only after inet_reqsk_clone() returns:
nreq = inet_reqsk_clone(req, nsk);
if (nreq) {
refcount_set(&nreq->rsk_refcnt, 1);
rcu_read_lock();
which reads as though the clone needs no RCU protection at all. A comment
on the prototype plus a lockdep assertion in the helper would keep this from
silently breaking if a future caller runs in process context.
[ ... ]
quoted hunk
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c index 6257459bcee24..896f472dcba29 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
[ ... ]
quoted hunk
@@ -961,6 +962,9 @@ static struct request_sock *inet_reqsk_clone(struct request_sock *req, rcu_assign_pointer(tcp_sk(nreq->sk)->fastopen_rsk, nreq); } + if (rsk_is_mptcp(req)) + mptcp_subflow_reqsk_clone(req, nreq); + return nreq; }
quoted hunk
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c index af81ad5e699d1..f13011f591b78 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c@@ -47,6 +47,37 @@ static void subflow_req_destructor(struct request_sock *req) mptcp_token_destroy_request(req); } +void mptcp_subflow_reqsk_clone(struct request_sock *req, + struct request_sock *new_req) +{ + struct mptcp_subflow_request_sock *subflow_req = mptcp_subflow_rsk(req); + struct mptcp_subflow_request_sock *new_subflow_req; + struct mptcp_sock *msk; + + new_subflow_req = mptcp_subflow_rsk(new_req); + + /* A non-NULL ->msk means the request owns one reference. The clone + * copied only the pointer, while the original request can concurrently + * transfer its reference to the child. Acquire a reference for the + * clone, then verify that the original request still owns the same msk. + * MPTCP sockets use SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU and all clone callers run in + * an RCU read-side critical section, keeping the memory stable here. + */ + msk = READ_ONCE(subflow_req->msk); + if (msk) { + struct sock *msk_sk = (struct sock *)msk; + + if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&msk_sk->sk_refcnt)) { + msk = NULL; + } else if (READ_ONCE(subflow_req->msk) != msk) { + sock_put(msk_sk); + msk = NULL; + } + }
[Severity: Low] Should this use refcount_inc_not_zero_acquire() instead? The increment here is followed by a validation load that re-reads subflow_req->msk and compares addresses. include/linux/refcount.h describes refcount_inc_not_zero_acquire() for exactly that pattern: * This function should be used when memory occupied by the object might be * reused to store another object -- consider SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU. refcount_inc_not_zero() provides no memory ordering and only orders future stores through the control dependency, so the second READ_ONCE() is not ordered after the refcount RMW. Can the second read then observe the stale non-NULL pointer while the increment landed on a freshly reused mptcp_sock at the same address, letting the address comparison pass? If so, the clone would own a reference to an unrelated live msk, and the third ACK would compute the HMAC against the wrong keys in subflow_hmac_valid(), rejecting the join with SUBFLOW_REQ_INC_STATS(MPTCP_MIB_JOINACKMAC). This needs load-load reordering on a weakly ordered architecture plus immediate slab reuse, so no concrete failing execution is demonstrated here, and the relaxed idiom is what the rest of net/ currently uses (for example __inet_lookup_established() and mptcp_token_get_sock()). An explicit smp_rmb() before the recheck would also cover it.
+ + new_subflow_req->msk = msk; +}
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but with only this patch applied
the clone fixup is incomplete for MP_CAPABLE token state.
inet_reqsk_clone() copies req->rsk_ops->obj_size bytes, so the whole
mptcp_subflow_request_sock is duplicated including ->token and the hashed
->token_node, and reqsk_migrate_reset() clears only saved_syn and the ireq
option pointers. This helper repairs ->msk only.
After a successful migration the original request is freed and unlinks the
shared token:
net/mptcp/token.c:mptcp_token_destroy_request() {
...
pos = __token_lookup_req(bucket, subflow_req->token);
if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(pos != subflow_req)) {
hlist_nulls_del_init_rcu(&pos->token_node);
bucket->chain_len--;
}
...
}
The surviving clone is then left with a token_node that looks hashed but is
no longer reachable, and mptcp_token_accept() trips its
WARN_ON_ONCE(pos != req) while bucket->chain_len accounting drifts.
The follow-up patch in this series, "mptcp: fix MP_CAPABLE token migration
when cloning reqsk", adds mptcp_token_move_request() and calls it from here,
and converts mptcp_token_accept()/mptcp_token_destroy_request() to
lock-rechecked, non-warning variants, so this is only a property of the
intermediate state. Given both patches carry the same Fixes tag and are
tagged for stable, is it worth noting in the changelog that applying 1/2
alone leaves that reachable WARN_ON_ONCE in place?
[ ... ]
quoted hunk
@@ -923,7 +954,7 @@ static struct sock *subflow_syn_recv_sock(const struct sock *sk, } /* move the msk reference ownership to the subflow */ - subflow_req->msk = NULL; + WRITE_ONCE(subflow_req->msk, NULL); ctx->conn = (struct sock *)owner;
-- Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/cover.1788202924.git.caoruide123%40gmail.com