Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 2 authors, 4d ago

Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix slave_cnt leak on XDP error paths

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Date: 2026-09-02 07:31:46
Also in: lkml

On 02/09/2026 08:21, Hangbin Liu wrote:
From: Hangbin Liu <redacted>

When bond_enslave() succeeds up to the XDP setup stage, slave_cnt is
already incremented. If XDP setup subsequently fails, the error paths
jump directly to err_sysfs_del, bypassing the slave_cnt decrement.

This causes slave_cnt to drift upward on each failed enslaving attempt,
which would lead to unbalanced traffic distribution with round-robin and
balance-xor mode.
I don't think it affects balance-xor, it's using usable_slaves->count which is
incremented only for actual usable slaves
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Fixes: 9e2ee5c7e7c3 ("net, bonding: Add XDP support to the bonding driver")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <redacted>
---
  drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 9 ++++++---
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 947d92a669b6..0305a017e327 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2305,7 +2305,7 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev,
  			SLAVE_NL_ERR(bond_dev, slave_dev, extack,
  				     "Slave does not support XDP");
  			res = -EOPNOTSUPP;
-			goto err_sysfs_del;
+			goto err_slave_cnt;
  		}
  	} else if (bond->xdp_prog) {
  		struct netdev_bpf xdp = {
@@ -2319,14 +2319,14 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev,
  			SLAVE_NL_ERR(bond_dev, slave_dev, extack,
  				     "Slave has XDP program loaded, please unload before enslaving");
  			res = -EOPNOTSUPP;
-			goto err_sysfs_del;
+			goto err_slave_cnt;
  		}
  
  		res = dev_xdp_propagate(slave_dev, &xdp);
  		if (res < 0) {
  			/* ndo_bpf() sets extack error message */
  			slave_dbg(bond_dev, slave_dev, "Error %d calling ndo_bpf\n", res);
-			goto err_sysfs_del;
+			goto err_slave_cnt;
  		}
  		if (bond->xdp_prog)
  			bpf_prog_inc(bond->xdp_prog);
@@ -2348,6 +2348,9 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev,
  	return 0;
  
  /* Undo stages on error */
+err_slave_cnt:
+	WRITE_ONCE(bond->slave_cnt, bond->slave_cnt - 1);
+
  err_sysfs_del:
  	bond_sysfs_slave_del(new_slave);
  
---
base-commit: 70f3995830d3f1e79faa14eb0605914f778feca9
change-id: 20260807-bond_slave_cnt-88e78c5f0ab9

Best regards,
I think we can just move the slave count inc after XDP setup when we can't fail anymore?
I don't see anything using it before the slave array update.

Cheers,
  Nik
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help