Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: Make skb_ext_put_sp() idempotent

On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:27:38 +0200 Jakub Sitnicki wrote:

+	if (!sp->len)
+		return;

Somewhat mixed feelings about explicitly checking what is the loop
bound, anyway. But I guess you can argue we shouldn't write len?
Probably not worth a respin either way

 	for (i = 0; i < sp->len; i++)
 		xfrm_state_put(sp->xvec[i]);
+	sp->len = 0;