Re: [PATCH net v2 6/8] tcp: fix use-after-free in the lockless listener path
From: Hyunwoo Kim <hidden>
Date: 2026-09-01 09:04:52
Also in:
lkml, stable
Subsystem:
networking [general], networking [tcp], the rest · Maintainers:
"David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Neal Cardwell, Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 04:37:22PM +0900, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 12:32:50PM +0900, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:quoted
tcp_v{4,6}_rcv() calls tcp_v{4,6}_do_rcv() without holding the socket lock when sk->sk_state is TCP_LISTEN. Every other path into tcp_v{4,6}_do_rcv() holds it. tcp_v{4,6}_do_rcv() and tcp_rcv_state_process() below it read sk->sk_state again. A listener can leave TCP_LISTEN through connect(AF_UNSPEC), and if that happens in between, the second read returns a different state. tcp_rcv_established() or tcp_rcv_state_process() then runs without the lock. If the second read returns TCP_SYN_SENT, the incoming SYN is treated as a crossed SYN and reaches tcp_send_synack(). When the SYN skb at the head of the retransmit queue is skb_cloned(), that function replaces it with a copy and releases the original with tcp_rtx_queue_unlink_and_free(). The original is the skb that a thread on another CPU is transmitting right now in __tcp_transmit_skb(). skb_cloned() is true because the clone made for that transmit is still alive. Once the transmit returns, tcp_update_skb_after_send() calls list_move_tail() on the skb's tcp_tsorted_anchor. In short: socket(AF_INET) -> bind() -> listen() // the socket that changes state socket(AF_INET) -> bind() -> listen() // the peer Several threads keep opening new sockets and connecting to the first socket's address. Another thread repeats this on the first socket: connect(AF_UNSPEC) // TCP_LISTEN -> TCP_CLOSE connect(peer address) // TCP_CLOSE -> TCP_SYN_SENT // another CPU still sees a listener, handles // one of those SYNs without the lock and // releases the SYN skb that this connect() // is transmitting // -> use-after-free connect(AF_UNSPEC) listen() // TCP_LISTEN again KASAN log: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x14/0x140 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88800a5d1460 by task poc/125 ... Call Trace: __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x14/0x140 tcp_update_skb_after_send+0x62/0x170 __tcp_transmit_skb+0xe33/0x1e40 tcp_connect+0x1b67/0x2490 tcp_v4_connect+0x998/0xab0 __inet_stream_connect+0x22c/0x700 inet_stream_connect+0x48/0x70 __sys_connect+0x101/0x130 ... Allocated by task 125: __alloc_skb+0xd1/0x370 tcp_stream_alloc_skb+0x2d/0x2b0 tcp_connect+0x72d/0x2490 tcp_v4_connect+0x998/0xab0 __inet_stream_connect+0x22c/0x700 inet_stream_connect+0x48/0x70 __sys_connect+0x101/0x130 ... The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88800a5d1400 which belongs to the cache skbuff_fclone_cache of size 472 Instead of taking the lock, keep the lockless path from reading sk->sk_state again to decide how to process the packet. Move the TCP_LISTEN handling out of tcp_rcv_state_process() into tcp_rcv_listen_state_process(), and let the TCP_LISTEN branch of tcp_v{4,6}_rcv() call a new tcp_v{4,6}_rcv_listen(). Listener processing does not change. The TCP_LISTEN arm of tcp_v{4,6}_do_rcv() is left alone, because a socket can finish listen() after the state check and a backlogged skb is then processed there. Fixes: e994b2f0fb92 ("tcp: do not lock listener to process SYN packets") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <redacted>Looking at this further, unhashing the listener and then calling synchronize_net() lets the disconnect path handle it. MPTCP needs a fix too, though, because it closes and reuses the first subflow directly without going through tcp_disconnect().
...and tcp_abort() needs a fix too.
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index b4237d0e994d6f..ce8e76052fe376 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c@@ -5139,6 +5139,9 @@ int tcp_abort(struct sock *sk, int err) if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) { tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE); + /* TCP BPF iterators run with RCU read-side protection. */ + if (!has_current_bpf_ctx()) + synchronize_net(); inet_csk_listen_stop(sk); }
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
This also closes the trigger path for patches 4, 5 and 8. I would still keep those, since they add no work to the fast path and they remove the root cause itself. Their changelogs would have to change though.diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c index b4237d0e994d6f..ae6ab3b22beb53 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c@@ -3373,6 +3373,8 @@ int tcp_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags) /* ABORT function of RFC793 */ if (old_state == TCP_LISTEN) { + /* Wait for lockless listener receive paths to finish. */ + synchronize_net(); inet_csk_listen_stop(sk); } else if (unlikely(tp->repair)) { WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_err, ECONNABORTED);diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c index b474d03620a75d..e41a5e1bf8dbf3 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c@@ -3432,7 +3432,7 @@ static __poll_t mptcp_check_readable(struct sock *sk) return mptcp_epollin_ready(sk) ? EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM : 0; } -static void mptcp_check_listen_stop(struct sock *sk) +static void mptcp_check_listen_stop(struct sock *sk, bool sync_net) { struct sock *ssk;@@ -3446,6 +3446,9 @@ static void mptcp_check_listen_stop(struct sock *sk) lock_sock_nested(ssk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); tcp_set_state(ssk, TCP_CLOSE); + if (sync_net) + /* Wait for lockless listener receive paths to finish. */ + synchronize_net(); mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(sk, ssk); inet_csk_listen_stop(ssk); mptcp_event_pm_listener(ssk, MPTCP_EVENT_LISTENER_CLOSED);@@ -3462,7 +3465,7 @@ bool __mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout) WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_shutdown, SHUTDOWN_MASK); if ((1 << sk->sk_state) & (TCPF_LISTEN | TCPF_CLOSE)) { - mptcp_check_listen_stop(sk); + mptcp_check_listen_stop(sk, false); mptcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE); goto cleanup; }@@ -3593,7 +3596,7 @@ static int mptcp_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags) if (msk->fastopening) return -EBUSY; - mptcp_check_listen_stop(sk); + mptcp_check_listen_stop(sk, true); mptcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE); mptcp_stop_rtx_timer(sk);Best regards, Hyunwoo Kim