On 8/22/26 2:09 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 23:45:41 +0200 Ilya Maximets wrote:
quoted
Unfortunately, this needs a rebase now that a conflicting change
for skb_zerocopy() was merged:
Ugh, I was supposed to merge this first, wasn't I? Sorry.
Not a huge deal, I guess, the conflict is mechanical and the patches
are simple. I can take care of manual backports once we get the
'failed to apply' emails. Just a bit of busy work.
I was hoping for Willem to TAL since skb_tx_error() is a tx ZC
thing, now I realized that he wasn't CCed :S (please do so on v4)
FWIW, I CCed a few people on v1 to have a conversation about a proper
fix, but that wasn't fruitful. So, if I were Norbert, I wouldn't
include them for the new versions either as doing so always feels like
me being annoying. :)
For now, the plan is to get v4 of these targeted fixes into net and
stable and then remove skb_tx_error() entirely once net-next is open,
as it seems to have lost all of its prior meaning.
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.