Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: stm32: Set TSO/TBS Tx queues default settings
From: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
Date: 2026-08-21 07:22:38
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel
On Thu Aug 20 2026, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 09:35:40 +0200 Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
I want to use ETF Qdisc with hardware offload, which is currently not possible on the stm32mp2.Do you need multiple queues for ETF/normal traffic? Or one ETF and one "normal"? How do you sort the traffic between the queues?So the stm32mp2 has two CPU cores. I've isolated CPU1 for Profinet. That one uses Tx/Rx queue 1 with ETF to reduce the Tx jitter. Everything else is routed to Tx/Rx queue 0. Config looks like this: # # Tx Assignment with SP. # # Tx Q 0 - Everything else # Tx Q 1 - RTC # tc qdisc replace dev ${INTERFACE} handle 100 parent root mqprio num_tc 2 \ map 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ queues 1@0 1@1 \ hw 1 # # Enable Tx launch time support for TC 1. # tc qdisc replace dev ${INTERFACE} parent 100:2 etf \ clockid CLOCK_TAI \ delta 500000 \ offload On Rx incoming frames are steered via PCP field (vlan tagged).Thanks for explaining!
No problem.
quoted
quoted
quoted
It seems like a static configuration in the driver today. I basically followed the same convention as dwmac-imx, dwmac-intel, dwmac-mediatek and dwmac-qcom-ethqos. Only dwmac-socfpga does it differently. Tx Launch Time requires a different DMA descriptor layout. Currently tc_setup_etf() just returns -EINVAL if the DMA configuration is not setup appropriately. I guess a dynamic configuration requires to change the DMA config and perform a full release/open cycle.release/open is not ideal but still better than hardcoding?For sure it's better than hardcoding :). But, again the driver does it statically. Maybe there's a good reason for it. Maybe not. I'm not that familiar with the stmmac driver. I'll prototype something to see whether we can enable TBS at run time using the ETF Qdisc callback. It may take some time though.I think the m in stmmac stand for 'mistake'.
:D
We need to start cleaning it up.
No objections here. I've briefly looked at the TBS thingy. I think we just need to reconfigure one Tx queue instead of doing a full release/open cycle. The XDP/ZC code does something similar. So the infrastructure seems to be in place. However, we need to keep track of what SoC implementation can enable TBS on which queue. For gmac4 we can probably reuse tbs_en and for xgmac there's is capability field tbs_ch_num. Let's see. Thanks, Kurt
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 861 bytes