[PATCH 0/4] net: broadcom: Improve IRQ error handling · <hidden> · 2026-08-20
[PATCH 1/4] net: bcmasp: Use platform_get_irq() for IRQ lookup · <hidden> · 2026-08-20
[PATCH 2/4] net: bcmasp: Propagate WoL IRQ errors from probe · <hidden> · 2026-08-20
[PATCH 3/4] net: systemport: Propagate IRQ lookup errors · <hidden> · 2026-08-20
[PATCH 4/4] net: bcmgenet: Propagate WoL IRQ errors · <hidden> · 2026-08-20
Re: [PATCH 0/4] net: broadcom: Improve IRQ error handling · Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> · 2026-08-20
Re: [PATCH 0/4] net: broadcom: Improve IRQ error handling · Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> · 2026-08-20
Re: [PATCH 0/4] net: broadcom: Improve IRQ error handling · Justin Chen <justin.chen@broadcom.com> · 2026-08-20
Re: [PATCH 0/4] net: broadcom: Improve IRQ error handling · Bui Duc Phuc <hidden> · 2026-08-21
Re: [PATCH 0/4] net: broadcom: Improve IRQ error handling · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2026-08-21
Re: [PATCH 0/4] net: broadcom: Improve IRQ error handling · Bui Duc Phuc <hidden> · 2026-08-21
Re: [PATCH 0/4] net: broadcom: Improve IRQ error handling · Bui Duc Phuc <hidden> · 2026-08-21

Re: [PATCH 0/4] net: broadcom: Improve IRQ error handling

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2026-08-21 02:57:44
Also in: lkml

What about -EPROBE_DEFER? Do you also want to ignore it and not
give the driver a chance to probe again?

Please do some git research. How long has the code been this way?

If -EPROBE_DEFER was a problem, why has nobody reported it?

    Andrew