Re: [PATCH 08/16] NTB: ntb_transport: Add opt-in direct-DMA channel reservation

From
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Date
2026-08-20 20:03:47
Also in
lkml
Reply to
Koichiro Den, 2026-08-10

On 8/10/26 9:51 AM, Koichiro Den wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Direct DMA is opt-in. Add 'use_direct_dma' module parameter to request
it. Some endpoint integrations expose NTB and DMA through sibling PCI
functions, so add direct_dma_func to select the DMA function when the
NTB device cannot return the DMA device directly.

When use_direct_dma is set and negotiation scratchpads are available,
locate the DMA device and reserve one suitable channel for every QP
before registering clients. This avoids negotiating direct TX before a
later-created QP discovers that no channel is available. If the full set
is unavailable, leave direct TX disabled. Note that direct RX does not
require these channels.

Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <redacted>
---
 drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
index f873eacd532b..6051d8abfc0d 100644
--- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
@@ -98,6 +98,16 @@ static bool use_dma;
 module_param(use_dma, bool, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_dma, "Use DMA engine to perform large data copy");
 
+static bool use_direct_dma;
+module_param(use_direct_dma, bool, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_direct_dma,
+		 "Use PCI endpoint DMA to transfer directly to peer RX buffers");
+
+static unsigned int direct_dma_func;
+module_param(direct_dma_func, uint, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(direct_dma_func,
+		 "PCI function number of a sibling endpoint DMA function");
This feel like very adhoc way of determining which DMA device to use. Is there a better way to do some sort of auto discovery without required user input?

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
 static unsigned int direct_dma_ring_entries = 64;
 module_param(direct_dma_ring_entries, uint, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(direct_dma_ring_entries,
@@ -147,6 +157,7 @@ struct ntb_transport_qp {
 	void *cb_data;
 	struct dma_chan *tx_dma_chan;
 	struct dma_chan *rx_dma_chan;
+	struct dma_chan *direct_dma_chan;
 
 	bool client_ready;
 	bool link_is_up;
@@ -269,6 +280,7 @@ struct ntb_transport_ctx {
 	struct work_struct link_cleanup;
 
 	struct dentry *debugfs_node_dir;
+	struct device *direct_dma_dev;
 	u32 direct_features;
 	u32 peer_direct_features;
 	unsigned int direct_ring_entries;
@@ -352,6 +364,97 @@ static inline u32 ntb_direct_ring_used(u32 head, u32 tail)
 	return head - tail;
 }
 
+static bool ntb_direct_dma_filter_fn(struct dma_chan *chan, void *data)
+{
+	struct dma_slave_caps caps;
+
+	if (chan->device->dev != data || dma_get_slave_caps(chan, &caps))
+		return false;
+
+	/* Payload and completion descriptors must complete in order. */
+	return caps.cmd_terminate &&
+	       !dma_has_cap(DMA_COMPLETION_NO_ORDER, chan->device->cap_mask) &&
+	       (caps.directions & BIT(DMA_MEM_TO_DEV));
+}
+
+static struct device *ntb_direct_get_dma_dev(struct ntb_dev *ndev)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *pdev = ndev->pdev;
+	struct pci_dev *dma_pdev;
+	struct device *dev;
+
+	if (ndev->ops->get_dma_dev) {
+		dev = ntb_get_dma_dev(ndev);
+		return dev ? get_device(dev) : ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+	}
+
+	if (!pdev || !pdev->bus || direct_dma_func > 7)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+
+	dma_pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus),
+					       pdev->bus->number,
+					       PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn),
+							 direct_dma_func));
+	if (!dma_pdev)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+
+	return &dma_pdev->dev;
+}
+
+static void ntb_direct_dma_release_channels(struct ntb_transport_ctx *nt)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nt->qp_count; i++) {
+		if (!nt->qp_vec[i].direct_dma_chan)
+			continue;
+
+		dma_release_channel(nt->qp_vec[i].direct_dma_chan);
+		nt->qp_vec[i].direct_dma_chan = NULL;
+	}
+}
+
+static void ntb_direct_dma_release(struct ntb_transport_ctx *nt)
+{
+	ntb_direct_dma_release_channels(nt);
+	if (nt->direct_dma_dev) {
+		put_device(nt->direct_dma_dev);
+		nt->direct_dma_dev = NULL;
+	}
+}
+
+static void ntb_direct_dma_init(struct ntb_transport_ctx *nt)
+{
+	dma_cap_mask_t mask;
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	if (!use_direct_dma)
+		return;
+
+	nt->direct_dma_dev = ntb_direct_get_dma_dev(nt->ndev);
+	if (IS_ERR(nt->direct_dma_dev)) {
+		dev_info(&nt->ndev->dev, "direct DMA device unavailable: %pe\n",
+			 nt->direct_dma_dev);
+		nt->direct_dma_dev = NULL;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	dma_cap_zero(mask);
+	dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
Are only slave DMA usable in this case? Is it not possible to do DMA with host DMA engines?

My main concern in all of this is looking for a way to make this usable for all ntb_transport users if possible and not niche the generic code to a specific hardware vendor.

DJ
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nt->qp_count; i++) {
+		nt->qp_vec[i].direct_dma_chan =
+			dma_request_channel(mask, ntb_direct_dma_filter_fn,
+					    nt->direct_dma_dev);
+		if (!nt->qp_vec[i].direct_dma_chan) {
+			dev_info(&nt->ndev->dev,
+				 "not enough direct DMA channels for all QPs\n");
+			ntb_direct_dma_release_channels(nt);
+			return;
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 struct ntb_payload_header {
 	unsigned int ver;
 	unsigned int len;
@@ -1476,6 +1579,16 @@ static int ntb_transport_probe(struct ntb_client *self, struct ntb_dev *ndev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	nt->ndev = ndev;
+	if (use_direct_dma &&
+	    (direct_dma_ring_entries < 2 ||
+	     direct_dma_ring_entries > NTB_DIRECT_MAX_RING_ENTRIES ||
+	     !is_power_of_2(direct_dma_ring_entries))) {
+		dev_err(&ndev->dev,
+			"direct DMA ring entries must be a power of two between 2 and %u\n",
+			NTB_DIRECT_MAX_RING_ENTRIES);
+		rc = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
 	nt->direct_ring_entries = direct_dma_ring_entries;
 
 	/*
@@ -1582,6 +1695,11 @@ static int ntb_transport_probe(struct ntb_client *self, struct ntb_dev *ndev)
 		if (rc)
 			goto err2;
 	}
+	if (ntb_direct_spads_available(nt))
+		ntb_direct_dma_init(nt);
+	else if (use_direct_dma)
+		dev_info(&ndev->dev,
+			 "not enough scratchpads for direct DMA negotiation\n");
 
 	mutex_init(&nt->link_event_lock);
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&nt->link_work, ntb_transport_link_work);
@@ -1605,6 +1723,7 @@ static int ntb_transport_probe(struct ntb_client *self, struct ntb_dev *ndev)
 err3:
 	ntb_clear_ctx(ndev);
 err2:
+	ntb_direct_dma_release(nt);
 	kfree(nt->qp_vec);
 err1:
 	while (i--) {
@@ -1648,6 +1767,7 @@ static void ntb_transport_free(struct ntb_client *self, struct ntb_dev *ndev)
 		iounmap(nt->mw_vec[i].vbase);
 	}
 
+	ntb_direct_dma_release(nt);
 	kfree(nt->qp_vec);
 	kfree(nt->mw_vec);
 	kfree(nt);
  
Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 3 authors, last reply 2026-08-28
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help