Re: [PATCH net-next v11 2/9] dt-bindings: net: lan9645x: add LAN9645X switch bindings
From: Jens Emil Schulz Ostergaard <hidden>
Date: 2026-08-17 14:21:08
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
This is my reply to: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260805-dsa_lan9645x_switch_driver_base-v11-0-007ebc983a0a%40microchip.com?part=2
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH net-next v11 2/9] dt-bindings: net: lan9645x: add LAN9645X switch bindings ---commit 1b95e77c1cab7610f3d242846549a69514641335 Author: Jens Emil Schulz Østergaard [off-list ref] dt-bindings: net: lan9645x: add LAN9645X switch bindings This adds a new DSA binding for the Microchip LAN9645x switch family, using the smallest SKU (microchip,lan96455s-switch) as the fallback compatible, and adds the file to the existing MAINTAINERS entry.quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,lan96455s-switch.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,lan96455s-switch.yaml
quoted
new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..043fb48922b41--- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,lan96455s-switch.yaml@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@[ ... ]quoted
+ ethernet-ports: + type: object + patternProperties: + "^ethernet-port@[0-8]$":Discovered by: opus-5 · Missed by: sonnet-5, sashiko-gemini · Confirmed by: sonnet-5 Are the constraints under this pattern actually reachable for all legal port node names? The top-level $ref pulls in dsa.yaml#/$defs/ethernet-ports, which accepts: patternProperties: "^(ethernet-)?ports$": patternProperties: "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9a-f]+$": description: Ethernet switch ports $ref: dsa-port.yaml# unevaluatedProperties: false So both port@N and ethernet-port@N are valid spellings, and indices are not limited to 0-8. The local ethernet-ports object here has no additionalProperties or unevaluatedProperties of its own, so children whose names do not match "^ethernet-port@[0-8]$" are simply not checked against the local constraints. That means these two both pass dt_binding_check: ethernet-ports { port@7 { phy-mode = "rgmii"; rx-internal-delay-ps = <500>; /* const: 2000 not applied */ }; }; ethernet-ports { ethernet-port@9 { /* index > 8 not rejected */ reg = <9>; }; }; Would using the "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-8]$" spelling here, as Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/vitesse,vsc73xx.yaml does with "^(ethernet-)?port@6$", make the new per-port constraints effective?
Yes, I will update the regex.
quoted
+ type: object + description: Ethernet switch ports + + $ref: dsa-port.yaml# + unevaluatedProperties: false + + properties: + rx-internal-delay-ps: + const: 2000 + + tx-internal-delay-ps: + const: 2000Discovered by: opus-5, sashiko-gemini · Missed by: sonnet-5 · Confirmed by: sonnet-5 Should these two properties be guarded by an rgmii phy-mode conditional? As written they are declared for every port index 0-8 with no phy-mode condition, and since they live in the same schema object that carries unevaluatedProperties: false, they count as evaluated for any phy-mode. This passes validation: ethernet-port@0 { reg = <0>; phy-mode = "gmii"; rx-internal-delay-ps = <2000>; }; Per the driver, only ports 7 and 8 have RGMII pins (lan9645x_phylink_get_caps(): 0..4 GMII/cuphy, 5..6 SerDes, 7..8 RGMII), and only lan9645x_rgmii_dll_config() programs the delay lines, with RGMII_IDX(port) defined for ports 4/7/8 only. On a gmii port the value is stored in p->rx_internal_delay by lan9645x_port_setup() and then never used, with no diagnostic. The existing pattern is a conditional, see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/vitesse,vsc73xx.yaml: "^(ethernet-)?port@6$": allOf: - if: properties: phy-mode: contains: enum: - rgmii then: properties: rx-internal-delay-ps: ... Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-controller.yaml also defines these properties only inside an rgmii* phy-mode conditional.
Yes, I will a conditional here.
Separately, ethernet-controller.yaml states: A value of 2000ps, i.e 2ns, and a phy-mode of "rgmii" will not be accepted by Reviewers which is the combination this binding mandates with const: 2000 and shows in the example below. Is a phy-mode of "rgmii" together with a 2000 ps internal delay intended here, rather than one of the rgmii-rxid / rgmii-txid / rgmii-id modes?
I think ethernet-controller.yaml talks about the situation where there is a PHY present. The intent here is a mac to mac connection. I was specifically instructed to model it like this, and not do use rgmii-*id as a way to communicate delay programming of the MAC. It is also clear from Documentation/networking/phy.rst that this is the right way to model mac to mac.
quoted
+ +$ref: dsa.yaml#/$defs/ethernet-ports + +required: + - compatible + - reg + - ethernet-ports + +unevaluatedProperties: false + +examples: + - | + ethernet-switch@4000 { + compatible = "microchip,lan96459f-switch", "microchip,lan96455s-switch"; + reg = <0x4000 0x244>; + + ethernet-ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + ethernet-port@0 { + reg = <0>; + phy-mode = "gmii"; + phy-handle = <&cuphy0>; + };[ ... ]quoted
+ + ethernet-port@7 { + reg = <7>; + phy-mode = "rgmii"; + ethernet = <&cpu_host_port>; + rx-internal-delay-ps = <2000>; + tx-internal-delay-ps = <2000>; + + fixed-link { + speed = <1000>; + full-duplex; + pause; + }; + }; + }; + }; +... +^^^ Discovered by: opus-5 · Missed by: sonnet-5, sashiko-gemini · Confirmed by: sonnet-5 This isn't a bug, but there is a blank line after the end-of-document marker at the end of the file, which git diff --check reports as "new blank line at EOF". The other bindings in this directory end with "..." and nothing after it.
I will remove this.
Cross-instance finding from sashiko-gemini
(008974e58f4042f8866239fc681c104931d4e9cd342a5b5be37f42504a115cf0):
Discovered by: sashiko-gemini, opus-5 · Missed by: sonnet-5 · Confirmed by: opus-5 The schema lacks an `mdio` node definition while setting `unevaluatedProperties: false` at the root,
which inadvertently prevents instantiation of the integrated PHYs referenced in the example.