On 2026-08-13 18:58:01 [-0700], Jakub Kicinski wrote:
Hi Sebastian!
Hi Jakub,
We have upgraded the slop...itifier since v2, it has more comments now...
The one about %ps potentially leaking more rather than less looks legit?
It complains about %ps leaking the pointer if kallsym is switched off.
This isn't unique to can and I pointed this out to Kees.
Oliver Hartkopp mentioned that he wanted to rework the can output.
I'm going to tell vsprintf to route the %ps output the same as %p for
!kallsym so this goes away.
Depending on what you prefer we can keep it as it or I drop the can bits
and repost everything else as-it. And then address later the other
sashiko bits where the documentation mentions "location of socket in
memory".
Sebastian