Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add ksock test for async callback guard
From: Mahe Tardy <hidden>
Date: 2026-08-13 10:13:24
Also in:
bpf
On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 05:25:40PM +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksock_wq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksock_wq.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..5b9c6cc303922 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksock_wq.c@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2026 Isovalent */ + +#include <unistd.h> + +#include "test_progs.h" +#include "ksock_wq.skel.h" + +void test_ksock_wq(void) +{ + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts); + struct ksock_wq *skel; + int err; + + skel = ksock_wq__open_and_load(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "ksock_wq open and load")) + return; + + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts( + bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.ksock_wq_start), &opts); + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "run ksock_wq_start")) + goto out; + if (!ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "ksock_wq_start retval")) + goto out; + + while (!__atomic_load_n(&skel->bss->callback_done, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE)) + usleep(1000);What happens if the workqueue callback never runs or blocks? This loop is unbounded, so the test would hang forever rather than failing. test_progs has no per-test timeout, so a hang here would block the entire test run. Adding an iteration cap (e.g. a bounded retry count followed by an ASSERT on callback_done) would turn a CI hang into a normal test failure. For comparison, prog_tests/wq.c uses a bounded usleep(50) before asserting.
Unsure how likely it is but it could be indeed improved in this way.
quoted
+ + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->create_err, -EOPNOTSUPP, + "workqueue create rejected"); + +out: + ksock_wq__destroy(skel); +}[ ... ] --- AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug. See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/31618864886