Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 1 author, 1d ago
WARM1d

Revision v7 of 7 in this series.

Revisions (7)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 [diff vs current]
  4. v4 [diff vs current]
  5. v5 [diff vs current]
  6. v6 [diff vs current]
  7. v7 current

[PATCH net v7 02/11] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg length

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2026-08-12 11:01:54
Also in: lkml
Subsystem: networking [general], rxrpc sockets (af_rxrpc), the rest · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, David Howells, Marc Dionne, Linus Torvalds

rxrpc_send_data() is given two data lengths (len and msg->msg_iter.count)
and is inconsistent about how it uses them.  Fix this by using len in
preference to msg->msg_iter.count.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Jeffrey Altman <redacted>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Fixes: 382d7974de31 ("RxRPC: Use iov_iter_count() in rxrpc_send_data() instead of the len argument")
---
 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
index 4c754f78ece9..626ef5778691 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
@@ -379,9 +379,9 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 
 	ret = -EMSGSIZE;
 	if (call->tx_total_len != -1) {
-		if (len - copied > call->tx_total_len)
+		if (len > call->tx_total_len)
 			goto maybe_error;
-		if (!more && len - copied != call->tx_total_len)
+		if (!more && len != call->tx_total_len)
 			goto maybe_error;
 	}
 
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 			 * the security header is going to be in the padded
 			 * region (enc blocksize), but the trailer is not.
 			 */
-			remain = more ? INT_MAX : msg_data_left(msg);
+			remain = more ? INT_MAX : len;
 			txb = call->conn->security->alloc_txbuf(call, remain, sk->sk_allocation);
 			if (!txb) {
 				ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -416,8 +416,8 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 		_debug("append");
 
 		/* append next segment of data to the current buffer */
-		if (msg_data_left(msg) > 0) {
-			size_t copy = umin(txb->space, msg_data_left(msg));
+		if (len > 0) {
+			size_t copy = umin(txb->space, len);
 
 			_debug("add %zu", copy);
 			if (!copy_from_iter_full(txb->data + txb->offset,
@@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 			txb->len += copy;
 			txb->offset += copy;
 			copied += copy;
+			len -= copy;
 			if (call->tx_total_len != -1)
 				call->tx_total_len -= copy;
 		}
@@ -439,8 +440,8 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 
 		/* add the packet to the send queue if it's now full */
 		if (!txb->space ||
-		    (msg_data_left(msg) == 0 && !more)) {
-			if (msg_data_left(msg) == 0 && !more)
+		    (len == 0 && !more)) {
+			if (len == 0 && !more)
 				txb->flags |= RXRPC_LAST_PACKET;
 
 			ret = call->security->secure_packet(call, txb);
@@ -449,7 +450,7 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 			rxrpc_queue_packet(rx, call, txb, notify_end_tx);
 			txb = NULL;
 		}
-	} while (msg_data_left(msg) > 0);
+	} while (len > 0);
 
 success:
 	ret = copied;
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help