Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/4] nvme-tcp: limit I/O queue count based on NIC queue count
From: Nilay Shroff <hidden>
Date: 2026-08-08 10:42:32
Also in:
linux-nvme
On 8/8/26 4:39 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 19:08:05 +0530 Nilay Shroff wrote:quoted
quoted
Looks like the userspace can already pass the preferred number of queues, so in this case, why not do all this netdev resolution and queue estimation in the userspace? Presumably most or the users you care about always go through nvme-cli, right?Yes, userspace can already specify the preferred number of I/O queues, and nvme-cli provides an option to do so when creating an NVMe/TCP connection. However, choosing an appropriate value requires userspace to know both the number of online CPUs and the number of active TX/RX queues on the NIC used for the connection. Determining the latter also requires identifying the correct netdevice. That may involve a route lookup to determine the egress interface, particularly when the NVMe/TCP host and target are not on the same subnet. So while this could be implemented in nvme-cli, it would require userspace to duplicate the logic needed to determine the actual netdevice and its current queue configuration. The intent of this change is to make the default queue selection automatic and avoid requiring users to determine and specify this topology manually.In another message you said you add ntuple filters. So you _are_ doing what you describe here as a problem. User space will know something we don't know sooner or later, so you should just add the uAPI instead of guessing in the kernel. BTW the queue count is likely to change after all of user space boots, so if you run before whatever configures queues for the machine in userspace you'll be using wrong counts.
Well, that ntuple filter configuration was done looking at the debugfs output which is produced in patch 4/4. The debugfs generates the enough information including queue count and per queue flow information which is then programmed into ntuple filter.
quoted
An explicitly specified "nr_io_queues" would still take precedence, so userspace can override the default when desired. Just for the note, this change also follows the general approach used by nvme-pci, where the default number of I/O queues is constrained by both the number of possible CPUs and the queue resources available from the controller.Not sure that maps well to networking. For TCP at least there will be a protocol stack that runs between the device queues and your queues. I guess that will depend on the network and the details of the benchmark. But again, better to let the user tune to their workload and machine. Consider patch 1 nacked.
My motivation here was to improve the default behavior for the common case where nr_io_queues is not explicitly specified. So if the preference is to keep this in userspace, would you be open to exposing the required information through a kernel interface (if something is still missing) and implementing the queue selection logic in nvme-cli instead? That would still allow us to automate the default queue selection without embedding this change in the kernel. Thanks, --Nilay