[PATCH net-next 13/15] i40e: Avoid repeating RX filter warning

From: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>

When the i40e runs out of space for RX filters the driver switches to
promiscuous mode and warns that it has done so. In scenarios with a
large number of these filters this can generate a lot of warnings. For
example:

  $ dmesg -c > /dev/null
  $ ip link add dev br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 vlan_default_pvid 1
  $ ip link set dev eth7 master br0
  $ bridge vlan add vid 1 dev eth7 pvid untagged self
  $ bridge vlan add vid 2-4094 dev eth7 tagged
  $ dmesg
  [   25.601705] i40e 0000:01:00.1: Error LIBIE_AQ_RC_ENOSPC, forcing overflow promiscuous on PF
  [   25.601833] i40e 0000:01:00.1: Error LIBIE_AQ_RC_ENOSPC, forcing overflow promiscuous on PF
  [   25.601961] i40e 0000:01:00.1: Error LIBIE_AQ_RC_ENOSPC, forcing overflow promiscuous on PF
  [   25.602088] i40e 0000:01:00.1: Error LIBIE_AQ_RC_ENOSPC, forcing overflow promiscuous on PF
  [   25.602216] i40e 0000:01:00.1: Error LIBIE_AQ_RC_ENOSPC, forcing overflow promiscuous on PF
  [   25.602344] i40e 0000:01:00.1: Error LIBIE_AQ_RC_ENOSPC, forcing overflow promiscuous on PF
  ...

Use test_and_set_bit() so that the warning is only issued when the
driver enables promiscuous mode and not on the addition of subsequent RX
filters.

Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Rinitha S <redacted> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
index 719f45b5cb40..abbc71e815ae 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c

@@ -2412,10 +2412,12 @@ void i40e_aqc_add_filters(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, const char *vsi_name,
 
 	if (fcnt != num_add) {
 		if (vsi->type == I40E_VSI_MAIN) {
-			set_bit(__I40E_VSI_OVERFLOW_PROMISC, vsi->state);
-			dev_warn(&vsi->back->pdev->dev,
-				 "Error %s adding RX filters on %s, promiscuous mode forced on\n",
-				 libie_aq_str(aq_status), vsi_name);
+			if (!test_and_set_bit(__I40E_VSI_OVERFLOW_PROMISC,
+					      vsi->state)) {
+				dev_warn(&vsi->back->pdev->dev,
+					 "Error %s adding RX filters on %s, promiscuous mode forced on\n",
+					 libie_aq_str(aq_status), vsi_name);
+			}
 		} else if (vsi->type == I40E_VSI_SRIOV ||
 			   vsi->type == I40E_VSI_VMDQ1 ||
 			   vsi->type == I40E_VSI_VMDQ2) {

@@ -2465,10 +2467,11 @@ i40e_aqc_broadcast_filter(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, const char *vsi_name,
 	}
 
 	if (aq_ret) {
-		set_bit(__I40E_VSI_OVERFLOW_PROMISC, vsi->state);
-		dev_warn(&vsi->back->pdev->dev,
-			 "Error %s, forcing overflow promiscuous on %s\n",
-			 libie_aq_str(hw->aq.asq_last_status), vsi_name);
+		if (!test_and_set_bit(__I40E_VSI_OVERFLOW_PROMISC, vsi->state)) {
+			dev_warn(&vsi->back->pdev->dev,
+				 "Error %s, forcing overflow promiscuous on %s\n",
+				 libie_aq_str(hw->aq.asq_last_status), vsi_name);
+		}
 	}
 
 	return aq_ret;

-- 
2.47.1