[PATCH net 0/2] tls: fix plaintext sk_msg ring over-fill in tls_sw_sendmsg_splice() · chanyoung <hidden> · 2026-07-26
[PATCH net 1/2] tls: don't over-fill the plaintext sk_msg ring in tls_sw_sendmsg_splice() · chanyoung <hidden> · 2026-07-26
Re: [PATCH net 1/2] tls: don't over-fill the plaintext sk_msg ring in tls_sw_sendmsg_splice() · Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net> · 2026-07-27
Re: [PATCH net 1/2] tls: don't over-fill the plaintext sk_msg ring in tls_sw_sendmsg_splice() · chanyoung <hidden> · 2026-07-27
Re: [PATCH net 1/2] tls: don't over-fill the plaintext sk_msg ring in tls_sw_sendmsg_splice() · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2026-08-03
[PATCH net 2/2] selftests: tls: add a test for splicing onto a full plaintext record · chanyoung <hidden> · 2026-07-26
Re: [PATCH net 2/2] selftests: tls: add a test for splicing onto a full plaintext record · Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net> · 2026-07-27
Re: [PATCH net 2/2] selftests: tls: add a test for splicing onto a full plaintext record · chanyoung <hidden> · 2026-07-27

Re: [PATCH net 1/2] tls: don't over-fill the plaintext sk_msg ring in tls_sw_sendmsg_splice()

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-08-03 22:13:30
Also in: linux-kselftest, stable

On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 21:58:04 +0900 chanyoung wrote:

2026-07-27, 12:30:48 +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:

quoted

This should never happen. We need to fix whatever path leads to that
invalid condition.

Your diff is right. Tested on net (53658c6f3682), stock config: without it
the test in 2/2 oopses in the AEAD walk, with it applied there is no oops
and no regression in the tls selftests.

Agreed, my patch was treating the symptom.

Sorry about the verbosity of v1.

Happy to send a v2 with your diff if you'd like me to carry it, or leave
it to you. Should Fixes: stay at fe1e81d4f73b?

Please send a v2, I don't see anyone else sending a fix for this.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help