[PATCH net-next 0/2] net: stmmac: Cleanup rx coalescing computation when using RIWT · Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> · 2026-08-02
[PATCH net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: ethtool: Address off-by-one when reading the coal rx-usecs · Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> · 2026-08-02
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: ethtool: Address off-by-one when reading the coal rx-usecs · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2026-08-02
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: ethtool: Address off-by-one when reading the coal rx-usecs · Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> · 2026-08-02
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: ethtool: Address off-by-one when reading the coal rx-usecs · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2026-08-02
[PATCH net-next 1/2] net: stmmac: ethtool: Comment the magic numbers in RIWT computation · Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> · 2026-08-02
Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: stmmac: ethtool: Comment the magic numbers in RIWT computation · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2026-08-02
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: stmmac: Cleanup rx coalescing computation when using RIWT · patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org · 2026-08-04

Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: ethtool: Address off-by-one when reading the coal rx-usecs

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2026-08-02 15:05:24
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

This does change the boundaries of accepted rx-usecs parameters, as the
previously accepted values were in the 16-246 us range, and now fall
into the 15-245 range on imx8mp.

With this change in place, what happens when trying to set 246?
EINVAL?

	Andrew

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help