Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/15][pull request] Introduce iXD driver

On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 10:33:25AM +0200, Larysa Zaremba wrote:

On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 06:15:26AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:24:15 +0200 Larysa Zaremba wrote:

quoted

I have looked though Sashiko feedback for this version. A lot medium+ comments 
were things that I have addressed as false-positives in v4, so those are left 
out, same as many of low-severity subjective issues. Unfortunately, patch 4 does 
need a fixup (see Re: for the patch itself), but hopefully this does not warrant 
another PR.

There's gazillion patches in the queue. Just fix the bugs and repost.
This "we will follow up" attitude is getting out of hand IMHO.

I was suggesting you could apply the fixup that I have posted under patch 4 
("libie: add control queue support"). If this is not possible, then Tony will do 
that and send another revision. (please respond)

Other feedback does not interfere with code working as intended, although 
Sashiko's feedback was pretty valuable in getting to the point where I can say 
that.

I see that Simon posted only medium+ feedback, I could address it one-by-one 
once more, if anyone would read that.

I realise that in the case of this patchset I forwarded AI-generated review
which somewhat overlapped with your own efforts: somehow I missed your
emails and I apologise for that.

But I wanted to make a general statement regarding commenting on
AI-generated review:

I do try (and as we see, sometimes fail), to take into account prior
discussion on the mailing list as part of my review process.  And I would
like to think that I am not alone in taking this approach.  So to that
extent, I think that responses on the ML to concerns flagged by
AI-generated review have value.