Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: ipv6: clear suppressed fib6 rule result
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Date: 2026-07-26 12:16:47
On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 12:48:52AM +0800, Ren Wei wrote:
From: Zhiling Zou <redacted>
fib6_rule_suppress() drops a suppressed route with ip6_rt_put_flags(),
but leaves res->rt6 pointing at the released rt6_info.
If no later rule supplies a replacement, fib6_rule_lookup() still sees
res.rt6 and returns that stale dst to its caller. A suppressing rule can
therefore leak a released route back to rt6_lookup(), and the next put
hits rcuref_put_slowpath() from dst_release().
Clear res->rt6 when suppressing the route so suppressed lookups fall
through to the null dst instead of reusing the released one.
Fixes: cdef485217d3 ("ipv6: fix memory leak in fib6_rule_suppress")
Doesn't matter in practice given this commit was backported, but it
seems that the bug was introduced by commit 7764a45a8f1f ("fib_rules:
add .suppress operation").
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Vega <redacted> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.4 Signed-off-by: Zhiling Zou <redacted> Signed-off-by: Ren Wei <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
--- net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
AFAICT, IPv4 doesn't suffer from this bug given that: 1. fib4_rule_suppress() only drops the reference from the FIB info when FIB_LOOKUP_NOREF is not set and it is always set by fib_lookup(). 2. Unlike fib6_rule_lookup(), __fib_lookup() doesn't ignore the return value of fib_rules_lookup() and propagates it to the callers.