Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 8d ago

Re: [PATCH net v3 2/2] octeon_ep_vf: fix skb frags overflow in the RX path

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-07-20 23:49:57
Also in: lkml

This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
octeon_ep_vf: fix skb frags overflow in the RX path

This patch adds a MAX_SKB_FRAGS check in __octep_vf_oq_process_rx() so
packets that would require more fragments than the skb can hold are
dropped, and factors the descriptor-drain loop into a new
octep_vf_oq_drop_rx() helper that is shared with the napi_build_skb()
failure path.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep_vf/octep_vf_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep_vf/octep_vf_rx.c
index d98247408242..aa77b673ae3e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep_vf/octep_vf_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep_vf/octep_vf_rx.c
@@ -357,6 +357,29 @@ static inline u32 octep_vf_oq_next_idx(struct octep_vf_oq *oq, u32 idx)
 	return (idx + 1 == oq->max_count) ? 0 : idx + 1;
 }
 
+static void octep_vf_oq_drop_rx(struct octep_vf_oq *oq,
+				struct octep_vf_rx_buffer *buff_info,
+				u32 *read_idx, u32 *desc_used)
+{
+	u16 data_len = buff_info->len - oq->max_single_buffer_size;
+
+	(*desc_used)++;
+	*read_idx = octep_vf_oq_next_idx(oq, *read_idx);
+	while (data_len) {
+		dma_unmap_page(oq->dev, oq->desc_ring[*read_idx].buffer_ptr,
+			       PAGE_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+		buff_info = (struct octep_vf_rx_buffer *)
+			    &oq->buff_info[*read_idx];
+		buff_info->page = NULL;
+		if (data_len < oq->buffer_size)
+			data_len = 0;
+		else
+			data_len -= oq->buffer_size;
+		(*desc_used)++;
+		*read_idx = octep_vf_oq_next_idx(oq, *read_idx);
+	}
+}
[High]
Does octep_vf_oq_drop_rx() leak the pages backing the dropped
descriptors?

The helper dma_unmap_page()s each fragment descriptor and then just sets
buff_info->page = NULL, without ever calling put_page() on the page that
was allocated by dev_alloc_page() in octep_vf_oq_fill_ring_buffers() or
octep_vf_oq_refill().

Compare with octep_vf_oq_free_ring_buffers() in the same file, which
appears to be the intended release pattern:

    for (i = 0; i < oq->max_count; i++)  {
        if (oq->buff_info[i].page) {
            dma_unmap_page(oq->dev, desc_ring[i].buffer_ptr,
                           PAGE_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
            put_page(oq->buff_info[i].page);
            oq->buff_info[i].page = NULL;
            desc_ring[i].buffer_ptr = 0;
        }
    }

After octep_vf_oq_drop_rx() returns, octep_vf_oq_refill() will overwrite
buff_info[refill_idx].page with a freshly allocated page from
dev_alloc_page(), so the previously-mapped page pointer is lost without
a matching put_page(), isn't it?

The head descriptor of the dropped packet looks affected too. The caller
in __octep_vf_oq_process_rx() has already stashed the head page's kernel
address into resp_hw and cleared buff_info->page:

    resp_hw = page_address(buff_info->page);
    buff_info->page = NULL;

On the two paths that now call octep_vf_oq_drop_rx() (the new
MAX_SKB_FRAGS-exceeded branch and the napi_build_skb() failure branch),
napi_build_skb() is either never called or returned NULL, so no skb has
taken ownership of resp_hw. Is the head page also leaked in these cases?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -431,25 +454,16 @@ static int __octep_vf_oq_process_rx(struct octep_vf_device *oct,
 			struct skb_shared_info *shinfo;
 			u16 data_len;
 
+			data_len = buff_info->len - oq->max_single_buffer_size;
+			if (DIV_ROUND_UP(data_len, oq->buffer_size) > MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
+				octep_vf_oq_drop_rx(oq, buff_info, &read_idx, &desc_used);
+				continue;
+			}
+
 			skb = napi_build_skb((void *)resp_hw, PAGE_SIZE);
 			if (!skb) {
 				oq->stats->alloc_failures++;
-				desc_used++;
-				read_idx = octep_vf_oq_next_idx(oq, read_idx);
-				data_len = buff_info->len - oq->max_single_buffer_size;
-				while (data_len) {
-					dma_unmap_page(oq->dev, oq->desc_ring[read_idx].buffer_ptr,
-						       PAGE_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
-					buff_info = (struct octep_vf_rx_buffer *)
-						    &oq->buff_info[read_idx];
-					buff_info->page = NULL;
-					if (data_len < oq->buffer_size)
-						data_len = 0;
-					else
-						data_len -= oq->buffer_size;
-					desc_used++;
-					read_idx = octep_vf_oq_next_idx(oq, read_idx);
-				}
+				octep_vf_oq_drop_rx(oq, buff_info, &read_idx, &desc_used);
 				continue;
 			}
[High]
The napi_build_skb() failure path had the same missing put_page() before
this patch, so that part is a pre-existing issue.

The newly added MAX_SKB_FRAGS check reaches octep_vf_oq_drop_rx() on a
device-triggered path (buff_info->len comes from the response header),
so a misbehaving or malicious device that repeatedly sends packets whose
fragment count exceeds MAX_SKB_FRAGS would drop roughly 18 pages per
packet with no accounting.

Would it be reasonable to have octep_vf_oq_drop_rx() put_page() the head
page (or have the caller do so before invoking it) and put_page() each
fragment page after dma_unmap_page(), mirroring the release sequence in
octep_vf_oq_free_ring_buffers()?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help