Re: [PATCH net-next v3 12/15] ibmveth: Expose per-queue buffer pool details via sysfs
From: mingming cao <hidden>
Date: 2026-07-17 01:54:59
Also in:
linuxppc-dev
On 7/14/26 6:01 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible. Full review at: https://sashiko.dev --- ibmveth: Expose per-queue buffer pool details via sysfs This commit adds a read-only sysfs attribute buffer_pools to the VIO device to expose per-queue buffer pool details dynamically. It outputs runtime per-queue buffer pressure metrics like size, active, and available buffers.quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c index 4e3f49b6346fd..ecc472ee8f71f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c@@ -2896,6 +2896,52 @@ static const struct net_device_ops ibmveth_netdev_ops = {[ ... ]quoted
+static ssize_t buffer_pools_show(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, + char *buf) +{ + struct net_device *netdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + struct ibmveth_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); + int len = 0; + int i, j; + + len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, + "Queue Pool Size BuffSize Active Available\n"); + len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, + "----- ---- ---- -------- ------ ---------\n");[Severity: Medium] Does this buffer_pools_show() implementation violate the sysfs "one value per file" design rule? The attribute appears to dump a complex, multi-line ASCII table with headers and columns rather than exposing a single value per sysfs file.
* Agreed this is more of a diagnostic dump than a sysfs one-value attribute. In v4 I’ll move it to debugfs ? *
[ ... ]quoted
@@ -3056,6 +3102,14 @@ static int ibmveth_probe(struct vio_dev *dev, const struct vio_device_id *id) netdev_dbg(netdev, "registered\n"); + rc = sysfs_create_group(&dev->dev.kobj, &ibmveth_attr_group); + if (rc) { + netdev_err(netdev, "failed to create sysfs attributes rc=%d\n", rc); + unregister_netdev(netdev); + free_netdev(netdev); + return rc; + }[Severity: High] If userspace brings up the interface immediately after register_netdev() succeeds, could adapter->work be scheduled before sysfs_create_group() fails? If this race occurs, unregister_netdev() does not synchronously cancel the work. Could the global workqueue execute the pending adapter->work item on freed memory after free_netdev() is called in this ibmveth_probe() error path?
* Good catch. remove() cancels the work, but this probe error path did not. Will cancel_work_sync() (and clean pool kobjects) before free_netdev() in v4. *
[Severity: High] This is a pre-existing issue in older error paths of ibmveth_probe(), but it is duplicated here: does this error path leak the adapter->rx_buff_pool kobjects? Since kobject_put() is not called on the pool kobjects before free_netdev() is executed, the kobjects remain attached to the VIO device with dangling pointers to the freed adapter memory. Could subsequent sysfs accesses to those pool kobjects trigger a use-after-free?
* Yes — that path (and some older probe failure paths) skip kobject_put() on the pool objects. I’ll add a common probe cleanup helper in v4 so pool kobjects and the reset work are always torn down before free_netdev(). * Thanks, Mingming