Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 3 authors, 16d ago

Re: [PATCH 01/13 RFC net-next] net: ipv4: introduce CONFIG_IPV4 to decouple the IPv4 stack

From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2026-07-12 11:04:07
Also in: batman, bridge, intel-wired-lan, linux-fsdevel, linux-nfs, linux-nvme, linux-rdma, linux-s390, linux-scsi, linux-sctp, linux-wireless, lkml, lvs-devel, mptcp, netfilter-devel, target-devel

On Sun, Jul 12, 2026, at 03:38, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
Historically, the IPv4 protocol has been linked to the core INET
subsystem. Because shared infrastructure like the TCP/UDP engine,
routing or INET hashtables live inside net/ipv4/, it has been impossible
to compile a kernel with only IPv6 support.

This patch introduces the CONFIG_IPV4 Kconfig symbol, which is set to
'def_bool y' for now. This does not allow to completely disable the
IPv4 stack yet but it lays the necessary build-system work for that
goal.
I expect this will cause additional (trivial) build regression in the
next step when randconfig builds run into obscure corner cases, either
with INET=y IPV4=n IPV6=y or with INET=y IPV4=n IPV6=n.

I can probably give your patch (with IPV4 visible or disabled) an
early go on the randconfig tree to find these more quickly.
If I run into regressions, should I just add more 'depends on IPV4',
or do you have other plans?

Should we have some logic to ensure that at least one of IPV4 or
IPV6 is enabled? I think this would work

config IPV4
      bool "The IPv4 protocol" if IPV6
      default INET

which only allows turning IPV4 off if IPV6 has enabled.

       Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help