On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 03:18:29PM +0100, Gary Guo wrote:
On Mon Jul 6, 2026 at 7:19 AM BST, Byungchul Park wrote:
quoted
wait_for_completion() can be used at various points in the code and it's
very hard to distinguish wait_for_completion()s between different usages.
Using a single dept_key for all the wait_for_completion()s could trigger
false positive reports.
Assign unique dept_key to each distinct wait_for_completion() caller to
avoid false positive reports.
While at it, add a rust helper for wait_for_completion() to avoid build
errors.
This will cause Rust code to share the same dept_key, so it will have all the
false positives that the change is trying to avoid.
Thank you for the input.
In general it is easy to create Rust bindings for static inline C functions
because it'll be just some computation, while creating bindings for C
function-like macros that define additional statics can be challenging.
Is dept_key similar to lock_class_key, where only the address matters? If so,
the approach that I use in
https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/DJP0CDOR98N5.29BK8PUFRWRUK@garyguo.net (local)
Yes, dept_key is similar to lock_class_key. IIUC, the way you tried for
lock_class_key can be applied to DEPT too. I will do:
1) add 'key' parameter to sdt_might_sleep_start_timeout()
2) introduce init_completion_dkey() to allow custom keys
3) remove init_completion_dmap() and adjust the existing users
Just in case, it's worth noting that the custom keys must be
well-managed using e.g. dept_key_destroy() when the key gets freed.
Byungchul
could be used for dept_key as well, then we can keep Rust `wait_for_completion`
still a function; otherwise we have to turn it into a macro too on the Rust side
to create such statics, which isn't ideal.
Best,
Gary
quoted
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
---
include/linux/completion.h | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/sched/completion.c | 60 +++++++++++-----------
rust/helpers/completion.c | 5 ++
3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)