Re: [PATCH net-next V5 6/6] net/mlx5: Apply devlink eswitch mode boot default on probe
From: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Date: 2026-07-09 06:00:32
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-rdma
On 08/07/2026 11:34, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 07:45:27PM +0200, mbloch@nvidia.com wrote:quoted
Apply devlink_eswitch_mode= boot defaults for mlx5 after the initial probe finishes device initialization while holding the devlink instance lock. At this point the devlink instance is registered and mlx5 can perform an eswitch mode change. Calling devl_apply_default_esw_mode() also clears any pending default apply work queued by devl_register(), so the queued work will not apply the same default again. Keep this call in mlx5_init_one() rather than the lower-level devl-locked init helper. That helper is also used by devlink reload, and devlink core already applies the boot default after a successful DRIVER_REINIT reload. Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c index 643b4aac2033..0712efea74cc 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c@@ -1392,6 +1392,17 @@ static void mlx5_unload(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)mlx5_free_bfreg(dev, &dev->priv.bfreg); } +static void mlx5_devl_apply_default_esw_mode(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev) +{ + struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(dev); + + if (!MLX5_ESWITCH_MANAGER(dev)) + return; + + devl_assert_locked(devlink); + devl_apply_default_esw_mode(devlink); +} + int mlx5_init_one_devl_locked(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev) { bool light_probe = mlx5_dev_is_lightweight(dev);@@ -1471,6 +1482,8 @@ int mlx5_init_one(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)err = mlx5_init_one_devl_locked(dev); if (err) devl_unregister(devlink); + else + mlx5_devl_apply_default_esw_mode(dev);I don't understand why this patch is needed at all. Just leave the job to the devlink core, no? That was the point to not pollute drivers with code like this. Is it some kind of leftover?
It was discussed with Jakub here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260611085440.4fe36bf2@kernel.org/ (local) The main reason is timing. If the default is applied only by devlink core, it has to wait until the driver drops the devlink lock. For mlx5, that usually happens very late in the init sequence. I wanted drivers to be able to apply the default as soon as the driver is ready for it, because on NICs with a DPU the host PF can remain stuck until the ECPF moves to switchdev. This API is also useful beyond the initial devlink registration path. Follow-up patches will use it for driver controlled paths that are not covered by the devlink core, such as recovery and FW reset. There is also a race window where userspace may take the devlink lock before the core gets a chance to apply the default. Letting the driver explicitly apply the default at the right point avoids that scenario. Thinking about this again, maybe the simpler approach is to apply the default from devl_unlock(). That would avoid the whole workqueue infra. I avoided doing that earlier because applying a default mode as a side effect of devl_unlock() feels a bit odd. But compared to adding dedicated workqueue handling maybe it is the lesser evil here. What do you think? About the extra API, I still think it's useful and would like to keep it if possible. Mark
quoted
unlock: devl_unlock(devlink); return err; -- 2.43.0