Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 2 authors, 10h ago

Re: [PATCH net-next V5 6/6] net/mlx5: Apply devlink eswitch mode boot default on probe

From: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Date: 2026-07-09 06:00:32
Also in: linux-doc, linux-rdma


On 08/07/2026 11:34, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 07:45:27PM +0200, mbloch@nvidia.com wrote:
quoted
Apply devlink_eswitch_mode= boot defaults for mlx5 after the initial
probe finishes device initialization while holding the devlink instance
lock.

At this point the devlink instance is registered and mlx5 can perform an
eswitch mode change. Calling devl_apply_default_esw_mode() also clears
any pending default apply work queued by devl_register(), so the queued
work will not apply the same default again.

Keep this call in mlx5_init_one() rather than the lower-level
devl-locked init helper. That helper is also used by devlink reload, and
devlink core already applies the boot default after a successful
DRIVER_REINIT reload.

Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
index 643b4aac2033..0712efea74cc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
@@ -1392,6 +1392,17 @@ static void mlx5_unload(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
	mlx5_free_bfreg(dev, &dev->priv.bfreg);
}

+static void mlx5_devl_apply_default_esw_mode(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
+{
+	struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(dev);
+
+	if (!MLX5_ESWITCH_MANAGER(dev))
+		return;
+
+	devl_assert_locked(devlink);
+	devl_apply_default_esw_mode(devlink);
+}
+
int mlx5_init_one_devl_locked(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
{
	bool light_probe = mlx5_dev_is_lightweight(dev);
@@ -1471,6 +1482,8 @@ int mlx5_init_one(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
	err = mlx5_init_one_devl_locked(dev);
	if (err)
		devl_unregister(devlink);
+	else
+		mlx5_devl_apply_default_esw_mode(dev);
I don't understand why this patch is needed at all. Just leave the job
to the devlink core, no? That was the point to not pollute drivers with
code like this. Is it some kind of leftover?
It was discussed with Jakub here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260611085440.4fe36bf2@kernel.org/ (local)

The main reason is timing. If the default is applied only by devlink
core, it has to wait until the driver drops the devlink lock.
For mlx5, that usually happens very late in the init sequence. I
wanted drivers to be able to apply the default as soon as the driver
is ready for it, because on NICs with a DPU the host PF can remain
stuck until the ECPF moves to switchdev.

This API is also useful beyond the initial devlink registration path.
Follow-up patches will use it for driver controlled paths that are
not covered by the devlink core, such as recovery and FW reset.

There is also a race window where userspace may take the devlink lock
before the core gets a chance to apply the default. Letting the driver
explicitly apply the default at the right point avoids that scenario.

Thinking about this again, maybe the simpler approach is to apply the
default from devl_unlock(). That would avoid the whole workqueue
infra.

I avoided doing that earlier because applying a default mode as a
side effect of devl_unlock() feels a bit odd. But compared to adding
dedicated workqueue handling maybe it is the lesser evil here.

What do you think?

About the extra API, I still think it's useful and would like to keep
it if possible.

Mark


quoted
unlock:
	devl_unlock(devlink);
	return err;
-- 
2.43.0
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help