Re: [PATCH ipsec] xfrm: policy: use hlist_del_init_rcu in xfrm_hash_rebuild to avoid bydst poison
From: Xiang Mei <hidden>
Date: 2026-07-03 05:22:16
On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 8:58 PM Florian Westphal [off-list ref] wrote:
Xiang Mei [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Agreed, and my patch hides it instead of avoiding it. The problem is the prep loop's guard is inverted: if (policy->selector.prefixlen_d < dbits || policy->selector.prefixlen_s < sbits) continue; That skips exactly the policies reinserted via the tree (prefixlen < threshold => policy_hash_bysel() NULL => xfrm_policy_inexact_insert()),Indeed.quoted
locates for the exact ones instead, which never allocate and get pruned again at out_unlock. So the inexact bin/node is allocated GFP_ATOMIC after the hlist_del_rcu(), and that's the failure the WARN catches. The reproducer lowers then raises the threshold so those bins are pruned and reallocated during reinsert; failslab just makes the failure deterministic, OOM would do the same. v2 inverts the guard so prep prepares the set that's actually reinserted: - if (policy->selector.prefixlen_d < dbits || - policy->selector.prefixlen_s < sbits) + if (policy->selector.prefixlen_d >= dbits && + policy->selector.prefixlen_s >= sbits) continue;Much better!quoted
I checked the new patch on the reproducer, and the crash can't be triggered. If you agree with this new patch, I'll send this as v2.Please do, thanks!
Thanks for checking with me. The v2 has been sent at: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260703051932.966884-1-xmei5@asu.edu/ (local) Xiang