Re: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] tun/tap & vhost-net: multi-threaded network performance
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2026-07-02 22:56:06
Also in:
lkml, regressions
Subsystem:
networking drivers, the rest, tun/tap driver · Maintainers:
Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds, Willem de Bruijn, Jason Wang
On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 01:07:47PM +0200, Brett Sheffield wrote:
On 2026-07-02 09:24, Simon Schippers wrote:quoted
On 7/1/26 22:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 09:16:48PM +0200, Brett Sheffield wrote:quoted
TL;DR - Commit 1d6e569b7d0c0b2736636749e4be0a27f3cefcb3 causes significant performance regressions with TAP interfaces and multithreaded network code. Please revert. Librecast is an IPv6 multicast library. One of the tests (0055) fails under Linux 7.2-rc1. The test performs data synchronization over IPv6 multicast using a TAP interface. This test has run successfully on every stable, LTS and mainline RC released in the past year. Every kernel with my Tested-by has run this test. There have been a bunch of changes to MLDv2 so I started bisecting there, but the culprit is actually 1d6e569b7d0c0b2736636749e4be0a27f3cefcb3 "tun/tap & vhost-net: avoid ptr_ring tail-drop when a qdisc is present" Reverting this commit fixes the test. To eliminate my code and any multicast weirdness, I ran tests with iperf3 comparing the same host running 7.2-rc1 both with and without 1d6e569b7d0 reverted.Thank you very much for your bisect! As the author, I am sorry for that regression!No worries. That's why we test :-)quoted
quoted
- does it help to increase the tun queue size?I agree, this would be great to know. However, even then we must act. I am considering IFF_BACKPRESSURE as a feature flag, defaulting to off. It would just enable/disable the stopping logic in tun_net_xmit() and the waking logic in __tun_wake_queue(). If disabled, it would result in the same logic as before. I could provide such a patch as [net] material.I'm going to make myself a strong cup of tea and dig into it a bit more here and will let you know if I find anything worth reporting. If you need me to try re-testing with specific settings or test a patch I'm happy to do so. Cheers, Brett -- Brett Sheffield (he/him) Librecast - Decentralising the Internet with Multicast https://librecast.net/ https://blog.brettsheffield.com/
Maybe it's the supposedly rare case? Does this change anything for you?
diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index bfa49fa9e3a1..bacd89460078 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c@@ -1018,7 +1018,6 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) struct netdev_queue *queue; struct tun_file *tfile; int len = skb->len; - int ret; rcu_read_lock(); tfile = rcu_dereference(tun->tfiles[txq]);
@@ -1064,19 +1063,24 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) goto drop; } - skb_tx_timestamp(skb); - - /* Orphan the skb - required as we might hang on to it - * for indefinite time. - */ - skb_orphan(skb); - - nf_reset_ct(skb); - queue = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, txq); spin_lock(&tfile->tx_ring.producer_lock); - ret = __ptr_ring_produce(&tfile->tx_ring, skb); + if (__ptr_ring_check_produce(&tfile->tx_ring)) { + spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.producer_lock); + netif_tx_stop_queue(queue); + smp_mb__after_atomic(); + if (!__ptr_ring_check_produce(&tfile->tx_ring)) + netif_tx_wake_queue(queue); + rcu_read_unlock(); + return NETDEV_TX_BUSY; + } + + skb_tx_timestamp(skb); + skb_orphan(skb); + nf_reset_ct(skb); + + __ptr_ring_produce(&tfile->tx_ring, skb); if (!qdisc_txq_has_no_queue(queue) && __ptr_ring_check_produce(&tfile->tx_ring) == -ENOSPC) { netif_tx_stop_queue(queue);
@@ -1087,18 +1091,6 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) } spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.producer_lock); - if (ret) { - /* This should be a rare case if a qdisc is present, but - * can happen due to lltx. - * Since skb_tx_timestamp(), skb_orphan(), - * run_ebpf_filter() and pskb_trim() could have tinkered - * with the SKB, returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY is unsafe and - * we must drop instead. - */ - drop_reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_FULL_RING; - goto drop; - } - /* dev->lltx requires to do our own update of trans_start */ txq_trans_cond_update(queue);