Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 1d ago

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] ptp: split non-host-disciplined PHC drivers into a dedicated subdirectory

From: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: 2026-07-01 12:08:50
Also in: linux-s390, lkml


On 2026/6/30 18:57, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2026-06-30 at 11:15 +0800, Wen Gu wrote:

I was thinking we'd move them to drivers/phc, and simplify them as we do.

Most of them are just a lot of PTP driver boilerplate, wrapping around
one central function like

static int vmclock_get_crosststamp(struct vmclock_state *st,
                                    struct ptp_system_timestamp *sts,
                                    struct system_counterval_t *system_counter,
                                    struct timespec64 *tspec)

...which is called with different permutations of arguments depending
on the actual PTP call.

I was thinking of reducing the duplication and having the PHC drivers
provide *only* that central function. Let the common PHC code provide
the interface to PTP (as well as to core timekeeping, for setting the
clock at boot, for timekeeping_set_reference() in the vmclock case, and
perhaps even for a PPS-like discipline from other clocks).

Here's a *very* hastily thrown together proof of concept; utterly
untested and AI-produced, and I've only given it the bare minimum of
oversight thus far (I have been meaning to do this for weeks but other
things have taken precedence so far)...

https://git.infradead.org/?p=linux-phc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next
Thanks for the POC. I've looked over it and agree this is a cleaner
approach overall. The v3 was meant as an interim step, but given the POC
it makes more sense to go straight to drivers/phc.

I'm happy to adapt the Alibaba CIPU PHC driver to the new framework
once it's in place, and glad to help along the way if needed.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help