Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] igc: Fix RX HW timestamp reporting when NET_RX_BUSY_POLL is disabled
From: Florian Bezdeka <hidden>
Date: 2026-06-24 09:11:25
Also in:
intel-wired-lan, lkml
On Tue, 2026-06-23 at 09:46 +0000, Kwapulinski, Piotr wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Intel-wired-lan <redacted> On Behalf Of Ding Meng via Intel-wired-lan Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 6:13 AM To: Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>; andrew+netdev@lunn.ch; davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org; pabeni@redhat.com; Kiszka, Jan <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>; Bezdeka, Florian <redacted> Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; meng.ding@siemens.com; wq.wang@siemens.com Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] igc: Fix RX HW timestamp reporting when NET_RX_BUSY_POLL is disabled When CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL is deactivated, fetching RX HW timestamps from the NIC no longer works as expected. This occurs because disabling CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL disables the SKB NAPI mapping in __skb_mark_napi_id(). Consequently, get_timestamp() fails to perform its driver lookup, and the igc driver's struct net_device_ops::ndo_get_tstamp is never invoked. Instead, get_timestamp() falls back to use shhwtstamps(skb)->hwtstamp, a field that the driver has not populated. Fix this by populating the hwtstamp field with the correct timestamp in the default timer when CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL is disabled. Fixes: 069b142f5819 ("igc: Add support for PTP .getcyclesx64()") Co-developed-by: Florian Bezdeka <redacted> Signed-off-by: Florian Bezdeka <redacted> Signed-off-by: Ding Meng <redacted> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c index 8ac16808023..1da8d7aa76d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c@@ -1992,7 +1992,26 @@ static struct sk_buff *igc_build_skb(struct igc_ring *rx_ring,return skb; } -static struct sk_buff *igc_construct_skb(struct igc_ring *rx_ring, +static void igc_construct_skb_timestamps(struct igc_adapter *adapter, + struct sk_buff *skb, + struct igc_xdp_buff *ctx) +{ + if (!ctx->rx_ts) + return; +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL + skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags |= SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP_NETDEV; + skb_hwtstamps(skb)->netdev_data = ctx->rx_ts; #else + struct igc_inline_rx_tstamps *tstamps;Please move at the top of the function and add:
That would trigger a "unused variable" warning in the CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL case. Btw: I was really confused that the #else statement moved to the end of the previous line. Might someone be using a wrongly configured mail client here? Florian
Reviewed-by: Piotr Kwapulinski <piotr.kwapulinski@intel.comquoted
+ + tstamps = ctx->rx_ts; + skb_hwtstamps(skb)->hwtstamp = igc_ptp_rx_pktstamp(adapter, + tstamps->timer0); +#endif +} +
[snip]