Re: [PATCH v2] mctp: serial: replace memset with zero-initialization
From: Manish Baing <hidden>
Date: 2026-06-06 19:50:42
Also in:
lkml
Hi David, Just a quick follow-up on this thread. When you have a moment, I would love to hear your thoughts on my previous email. Please let me know how you would like me to proceed with this patch. Thanks & Regards , Manish On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 3:06 PM Manish Baing [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi David, I understand that this might just be unnecessary churn for the networking subsystem, and I am perfectly fine dropping the patch if that is the case. However, for my own learning, I would love to get your perspective on this. I was carrying over a pattern from recent cleanups in the IIO subsystem [1], as empty brace initialization was noted as the preferred approach in those discussions (including by Kees Cook [2]). Is the reasoning behind that recommendation just not applicable to netdev,or is the policy here strictly against code churn unless it fixes a tangible bug? Thanks for the guidance. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611-iio-zero-init-stack-with-instead-of-memset-v1-0-ebb2d0a24302@baylibre.com/ (local) [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/202505090942.48EBF01B@keescook/ (local) Regards, Manish On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 2:42 PM David Laight [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Sat, 30 May 2026 22:46:46 +0000 Manish Baing [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Use empty brace initialization (= {}) instead of explicit memset() to zero-initialize stack memory to simplify the code. No functional change.Isn't it also entirely pointless? -- Davidquoted
Signed-off-by: Manish Baing <redacted> --- Changes in v2: - Fixed a compilation error caused by a duplicate variable declaration caught by the kernel test robot. drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c b/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c index 26c9a33fd636..df721ca4e07b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c +++ b/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c@@ -536,13 +536,12 @@ struct test_chunk_tx { static void test_next_chunk_len(struct kunit *test) { - struct mctp_serial devx; + struct mctp_serial devx = { }; struct mctp_serial *dev = &devx; int next; const struct test_chunk_tx *params = test->param_value; - memset(dev, 0x0, sizeof(*dev)); memcpy(dev->txbuf, params->input, params->input_len); dev->txlen = params->input_len;