Re: [PATCH net-next 05/11] tcp: allow mptcp to drop TS for some packets
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-06-01 08:07:16
Also in:
lkml, mptcp
On 01/06/2026 17:26, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 11:52 PM Matthieu Baerts [off-list ref] wrote:
(...)
quoted
The modifications in net/ipv4/tcp_output.c would then be limited to:diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c index ef0c10cd31c7..f4edc9c4f3fc 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c@@ -1181,12 +1181,18 @@ static unsigned int tcp_established_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb */ if (sk_is_mptcp(sk)) { unsigned int remaining = MAX_TCP_OPTION_SPACE - size; + bool has_ts = opts->options & OPTION_TS; unsigned int opt_size = 0; if (mptcp_established_options(sk, skb, &opt_size, remaining, - &opts->mptcp)) { + has_ts, &opts->mptcp)) { opts->options |= OPTION_MPTCP; size += opt_size; + +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP) + if (opts->mptcp.drop_ts) + opts->options &= ~OPTION_TS; +#endifSGTM, but maybe the IS_ENABLED() is not needed in this block, guarded by if (sk_is_mptcp(sk)) ?
It looks like it is still needed, same if I use:
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP) && sk_is_mptcp(sk)) {
Or maybe I missed another technique to avoid an extra #if.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.