On Sat, May 02, 2026 at 11:00:53PM -0700, Ethan Nelson-Moore wrote:

Hi, Greg,

On Sat, May 2, 2026 at 10:44 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Then that means someone uses it somewhere.  Don't generate bindings for
something that will break because it is no longer in the tree :(

That project generates bindings for every UAPI header automatically,
but has a hardcoded list of them, so its presence there doesn't mean
anyone is using it.

quoted

If no one does use it, then please get that project to fix their code so
that we don't break their build.

They have had to remove headers from their list that got removed from
the kernel before. I will send them a pull request to remove this
header and then resend this patch with the UAPI header removal
restored. Does that sound good to you?

Sounds like a whack a mole problem. I assume the recent removal of ATM
broke it as well? Maybe __has_include() could be used?

      Andrew