On Mon, 04 May 2026 17:27:48 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/drivers/net/netkit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netkit.c
@@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ static void netkit_setup(struct net_device *dev)
dev->priv_flags |= IFF_NO_QUEUE;
dev->priv_flags |= IFF_DISABLE_NETPOLL;
dev->lltx = true;
+ dev->netmem_tx = NETMEM_TX_NO_DMA;
dev->netdev_ops = &netkit_netdev_ops;
dev->ethtool_ops = &netkit_ethtool_ops;
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 0e1e581efc5a..11d68e75eb4f 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -1788,6 +1788,12 @@ enum netdev_stat_type {
NETDEV_PCPU_STAT_DSTATS, /* struct pcpu_dstats */
};
+enum netmem_tx_mode {
+ NETMEM_TX_NONE, /* no netmem TX support */
+ NETMEM_TX_DMA, /* DMA-capable netmem TX (real HW) */
+ NETMEM_TX_NO_DMA, /* no DMA, e.g. passthrough for virtual devs */
Now there's a little too much here, let's move the NO_DMA changes to
another patch. Just convert the netmem_tx to an enum and change the
existing drivers in patch 1.
Next patch has:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1164,16 +1197,30 @@ int netdev_nl_bind_tx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
goto err_unlock_netdev;
}
- if (!netdev->netmem_tx) {
+ if (netdev->netmem_tx == NETMEM_TX_NONE) {
err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(info->extack,
"Driver does not support netmem TX");
goto err_unlock_netdev;
}
which also should have been in patch 1.