RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/6] net: mana: Query device capabilities and configure MSI-X sharing for EQs
From: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
Date: 2026-05-04 22:21:55
Also in:
linux-hyperv, linux-rdma, lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2026 8:09 AM To: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com> Cc: 'Simon Horman' <horms@kernel.org>; Konstantin Taranov [off-list ref]; kuba@kernel.org; davem@davemloft.net; pabeni@redhat.com; edumazet@google.com; andrew+netdev@lunn.ch; jgg@ziepe.ca; leon@kernel.org; Haiyang Zhang [off-list ref]; KY Srinivasan [off-list ref]; wei.liu@kernel.org; Dexuan Cui [off-list ref]; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/6] net: mana: Query device capabilities and configure MSI-X sharing for EQs From: 'Simon Horman' <horms@kernel.org> This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible. Full review at: https://sashiko.d/ ev%2F&data=05%7C02%7Clongli%40microsoft.com%7C1b8423bb5d15490288be 08dea85cb944%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C6391333 13365211100%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYi OiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0 %7C%7C%7C&sdata=H6rPcEM62LmbWsXdpSVcVaaec3Wx6KJnTnYS0fBk6vY%3D &reserved=0 --- net: mana: Query device capabilities and configure MSI-X sharing for EQs When querying the device, this adjusts the max number of queues to allow dedicated MSI-X vectors for each vPort, clamping to no less than MANA_DEF_NUM_QUEUES. MSI-X sharing among vPorts is disabled by default and enabled only when there are not enough vectors. It also renames mana_query_device_cfg() to mana_gd_query_device_cfg().quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.cb/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c[ ... ]quoted
+ /* + * Adjust gc->max_num_queues returned from the SOC to allowdedicatedquoted
+ * MSIx for each vPort. Clamp to no less thanMANA_DEF_NUM_QUEUES.quoted
+ */ + max_num_queues = (gc->num_msix_usable - 1) / num_ports; + max_num_queues = roundup_pow_of_two(max(max_num_queues, 1U));Does rounding up here inflate max_num_queues and unnecessarily force MSI-X sharing? For example, if there are 63 usable MSIs and 2 ports, the division yields 31. Rounding up gives 32. The subsequent check below:quoted
+ /* + * Use dedicated MSIx for EQs whenever possible, use MSIx sharing for + * Ethernet EQs when (max_num_queues * num_ports >num_msix_usable - 1)quoted
+ */ + max_num_queues = min(gc->max_num_queues, max_num_queues); + if (max_num_queues * num_ports > gc->num_msix_usable - 1) + gc->msi_sharing = true;would then evaluate to true (32 * 2 > 63) and force the driver into MSI-X shared mode. This seems to contradict the intent to use dedicated MSI-X whenever possible. Would it be better to use rounddown_pow_of_two() instead to ensure the calculated queues fit within the available dedicated vectors?
The roundup is intentional. The primary goal is to maximize the number of queues per vPort for throughput - power-of-2 queue counts align with RSS indirection table sizes and give the best distribution. Dedicated MSI-X is preferred when it comes for free, but not at the cost of halving the queue count. In your example (63 MSIs, 2 ports), rounddown would give 16 queues per port - nearly half the 31 that the hardware could support. Roundup gives 32 and triggers sharing mode, but sharing mode is designed to work correctly and the queues still get serviced. The driver trades per-EQ interrupt exclusivity for better parallelism, which is the right tradeoff for network throughput on these devices. The sharing check exists as a fallback for exactly this situation - it is not a failure mode but a deliberate operating point.
[ ... ]quoted
@@ -1968,20 +2008,30 @@ static int mana_gd_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev) if (err) goto destroy_hwc; - err = mana_gd_query_max_resources(pdev); + err = mana_gd_detect_devices(pdev); if (err) goto destroy_hwc; - err = mana_gd_setup_remaining_irqs(pdev); - if (err) { - dev_err(gc->dev, "Failed to setup remaining IRQs: %d", err); - goto destroy_hwc; - } - - err = mana_gd_detect_devices(pdev); + err = mana_gd_query_max_resources(pdev); if (err) goto destroy_hwc; + if (!gc->msi_sharing) { + gc->msi_bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(gc->num_msix_usable,GFP_KERNEL);quoted
+ if (!gc->msi_bitmap) { + err = -ENOMEM; + goto destroy_hwc; + } + /* Set bit for HWC */ + set_bit(0, gc->msi_bitmap); + } else { + err = mana_gd_setup_remaining_irqs(pdev); + if (err) { + dev_err(gc->dev, "Failed to setup remaining IRQs: %d",err);quoted
+ goto destroy_hwc; + } + }If msi_sharing is disabled, we allocate the msi_bitmap but skip calling mana_gd_setup_remaining_irqs(). Since mana_gd_setup_hwc_irqs() only allocates a single vector for the hardware channel when dynamic allocation is supported, does this leave the device without interrupts for its Ethernet queues? If so, it seems this could lead to queue creation failures when the driver attempts to map uninitialized vectors. I notice this is fixed in a later patch in the series ("net: mana: Allocate interrupt context for each EQ when creating vPort"), but does leaving it out here break bisectability?
You're right that with pci_msix_can_alloc_dyn() returning true on MANA, the non-sharing path is reachable between patches 2 and 5. In that window, mana_gd_register_irq() would fail with -EINVAL because irq_contexts for indices 1+ haven't been populated yet. However, the failure is contained: mana_create_eq() returns an error, mana_alloc_queues() propagates it, and the interface fails to come up cleanly - no WARN, no crash, no data corruption. The driver remains in a consistent state and succeeds once the full series is applied. This is a new capability being built up across the series. The dedicated MSI-X mode did not exist before, so there is no regression from the pre-patch baseline - the pre-patch code always went through mana_gd_setup_remaining_irqs() and operated in what is now called sharing mode. Restructuring the series to make non-sharing mode functional at each intermediate commit would require squashing the GIC infrastructure (patches 3-4) into this patch, producing a single large change that is significantly harder to review. I'd prefer to keep the logical separation as-is. If you feel strongly about strict bisectability, I could add a fallback in this patch that forces msi_sharing = true when the GIC allocator is not yet available, and have patch 5 remove it - but that adds throwaway code to an intermediate commit.